This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the course for this article: Course on Unanticipated Day of Surgery Deaths Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bishop, M. J. Articles by Domino, K. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bishop, M. J. Articles by Domino, K. B. Related Collections Critical Care Complications Outcomes Patient Safety

---

PATIENT SAFETY

Factors Associated with Unanticipated Day of Surgery Deaths in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals

Michael J. Bishop, MD^*||, Jennifer E. Souders, MD, Cecilia M. Peterson, MSPH, William G. Henderson, PhD, and Karen B. Domino, MD, MPH^||

From the *Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office Anesthesia Service, Washington, DC; The Puget Sound Veterans Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; The Colorado Health Outcomes Program of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado; and ||The Department of Anesthesiology at the University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

Address correspondence to Michael J. Bishop, MD, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108. Address e-mail to michael. bishop{at}va.gov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients of ASA physical status 1, 2, and 3 undergoing elective surgery do not have underlying conditions that are a constant threat to life, and hence should not be expected to be at significant risk for death on the day of surgery.

METHODS: We analyzed 815,077 ASA physical status 1, 2, and 3 elective surgery patients in the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who died on the day of surgery. We then attempted to identify factors predictive of unexpected death and to identify potential areas for improvement in care. A subset of the cases underwent individual chart review as well to identify areas for improvement in anesthesia care.

RESULTS: Of the total patients, 0.08% died on the day of surgery. The strongest predictive factor by multiple variable regression was the type of surgery, with aortic surgery resulting in an odds ratio of 13.67, (95% CI 9.76–19.17). Other factors predictive of death were identified by multiple variable regressions and included low albumin, existence of dyspnea, and elevated bilirubin or creatinine. Chart reviews of 88 of the deaths found that opportunities for improved anesthesia care were present in 13 of the 88. We estimated that a death that might have been prevented by improved anesthesia care occurred in approximately 1/13,900 cases. Myocardial infarction and hemorrhage were frequently identified factors. An unexpected factor was that the period between the conclusion of surgery and the final transfer of care in recovery was a time when many of the deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, although patient and surgical factors lead to the vast majority of deaths on the day of surgery, there are identifiable areas for reducing the incidence of such deaths by improvements in anesthesia care.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. S. Lagasse The Right Stuff: Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 1772 - 1774. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. L. Pace Independent Predictors from Stepwise Logistic Regression May Be Nothing More than Publishable P Values Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 1775 - 1778. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Bishop, W. G. Henderson, and K. B. Domino Regression Analysis for a Large Database Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 2090 - 2090. [Full Text] [PDF]