JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2009; 108:192-198
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818e0cee
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bräuer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Quintel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bräuer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Quintel, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Equipment
Right arrow Patient Safety
Right arrow Technology


TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

What Determines the Efficacy of Forced-Air Warming Systems? A Manikin Evaluation with Upper Body Blankets

Anselm Bräuer, MD, PhD, DEAA*, Henning Bovenschulte, MD{dagger}, Thorsten Perl, MD*, Wolfgang Zink, MD, PhD, DEAA*, Michael John Murray English, FRCA{ddagger}, and Michael Quintel, MD, PhD*

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; {dagger}Department of Radiology, University of Colonge, Colonge, Germany; and {ddagger}Department of Anesthesia, Montreal General Hospital and McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Anselm Bräuer, Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany. Address e-mail to abraeue{at}gwdg.de.

BACKGROUND: Forced-air warming has gained acceptance as an effective means to prevent perioperative hypothermia. However, little is known about the influence of air flow and air temperature at the nozzle and the influence of heat distribution in the blankets on the efficacy of these systems.

METHODS: We conducted a manikin study with heat flux transducers using five forced-air warming systems to determine the factors that are responsible for heat transfer from the blanket to the manikin.

RESULTS: There was no relation between air temperature at the nozzle of the power unit and the resulting heat transfer. There was also no relation between the air flow at the nozzle of the power unit and the resulting heat transfer. However, all blankets performed best at high air flows above 19 L/s. The heat exchange coefficient, the mean temperature gradient between the blanket and the manikin correlated positively with the resulting heat transfer and the difference between the minimal and maximal blanket temperature correlated negatively with the resulting heat transfer.

CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of forced-air warming systems is primarily determined by the blanket. Modern power units provide sufficient heat energy to maximize the ability of the blanket to warm the patient. Optimizing blanket design by optimizing the mean temperature gradient between the blanket and the manikin (or any other surface) with a very homogeneous temperature distribution in the blanket will enable the manufacturers to develop better forced-air warming systems.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.