This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Horstman, D. J. Articles by Carvalho, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Horstman, D. J. Articles by Carvalho, B. Related Collections Obstetrics Anesthetic Techniques Regional Anesthesia

---

OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY

A Randomized Trial of Maximum Cephalad Sensory Blockade with Single-Shot Spinal Compared with Combined Spinal-Epidural Techniques for Cesarean Delivery

From the Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Address correspondence to Brendan Carvalho MBBCh, FRCA, Department of Anesthesia, H3580, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305. Address e-mail to bcarvalho{at}stanford.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown more extensive cephalad sensory blockade in women receiving combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia compared with single-shot spinal (SSS) anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. It has been postulated that introduction of the epidural needle during CSE disturbs the negative pressure in the epidural space, resulting in relatively greater cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure and increased spread of intrathecal local anesthetic. We tested the hypothesis that CSE results in more extensive cephalad sensory blockade than SSS anesthesia and that loss-of-resistance during initiation of CSE anesthesia increases CSF pressure compared with SSS.

METHODS: Thirty parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study. Patients received either SSS or CSE anesthesia with equal doses of intrathecal anesthetic (hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg, fentanyl 10 µg and morphine 200 µg). Before the intrathecal injection, the CSF pressure was measured with a fiberoptic pressure sensor. Maximum cephalad sensory blockade to pinprick, cold and touch was measured. The total dose of phenylephrine required to maintain baseline arterial blood pressure was also recorded.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the median (interquartile range) pinprick sensory block height [T4 (T4–2) vs T3 (T4–1)] or CSF pressures [6 (4–12) vs 9 (8–12) mm Hg] between the SSS and CSE groups. There were no significant correlations between CSF pressure and block height or total dose of phenylephrine.

CONCLUSION: The SSS and CSE techniques inserted in the lateral decubitus position resulted in similar extent of sensory blockade and CSF pressure. These findings suggest that altering the intrathecal dose is not necessary and that any difference in intrathecal pressure associated with initial placement of an epidural needle in the epidural space during CSE anesthesia is clinically inconsequential.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Benhamou and C. Wong Neuraxial Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: What Criteria Define the "Optimal" Technique? Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1370 - 1373. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Leo, B. L. Sng, Y. Lim, and A. T. H. Sia A Randomized Comparison of Low Doses of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1600 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]