This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ruíz, A. Articles by Carrera, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ruíz, A. Articles by Carrera, A.

---

ANALGESIA

The Influence of Arm Abduction on the Anatomic Relations of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus: An Ultrasound Study

Ana Ruíz^*, Xavier Sala^*, Xavier Bargalló, Paola Hurtado^*, Maria Jose Arguis^*, and Ana Carrera

From the Departments of *Anesthesiology, Radiology, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Human Anatomy, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ana Ruiz, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona., Villaroel, 170., 080036 Barcelona, Spain. Address e-mail to 32455arp{at}comb.es.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distances from brachial plexus to the coracoid process and the pleura are critical for performing infraclavicular block. We evaluated the influence of arm abduction on the position of the neurovascular bundle relative to the skin, to the coracoid process and to the pleura using ultrasonography.

METHODS: An ultrasound examination of the brachial plexus at the infraclavicular level was performed on 26 patients. Distances from the axillary artery to the skin, to the coracoid process and to the pleura were measured and noted with different degrees of arm abduction (0°, 45°, and 90°). Vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block was then performed by means of nerve stimulation in 14 additional patients undergoing hand surgery.

RESULTS: Under ultrasound examination, the distance from the axillary artery to the skin was found to be significantly less with arm abduction (0°: 32 ± 7 mm, 45°: 29 ± 7 mm, 90°: 25 ± 5 mm, P < 0.05). The distance from the skin to the pleura was 47 ± 5 mm with a medial deviation of 18 ± 3 degrees and was not influenced by arm position. Brachial plexus was identified by nerve stimulation at a vertical depth of 41 ± 7 mm from the skin.

CONCLUSION: Abduction of the arm reduces the depth of the brachial plexus but does not change the position of the axillary artery relative to the coracoid process or the pleura. Ultrasonography may under-estimate the actual depth of the plexus.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Sala Blanch, A. M. Lopez, J. Carazo, A. Hadzic, A. Carrera, J. Pomes, and J. Valls-Sole Intraneural injection during nerve stimulator-guided sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2009; 102(6): 855 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]