This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chung, F. Articles by Wong, D. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chung, F. Articles by Wong, D. T. Related Collections Ambulatory Preoperative Evaluation

---

AMBULATORY ANESTHESIOLOGY

Elimination of Preoperative Testing in Ambulatory Surgery

From the Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to Frances Chung, FRCPC, Department of Anesthesia, McL 2-405, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St. Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 2S8. Address e-mail to frances.chung{at}uhn.on.ca.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative testing has been criticized as having little impact on perioperative outcomes. We conducted a randomized, single-blind, prospective, controlled pilot study to determine whether indicated preoperative testing can be eliminated without increasing the perioperative incidence of adverse events in selected patients undergoing ambulatory surgery.

METHODS: One thousand sixty-one eligible patients were randomized either to have indicated preoperative testing or no preoperative testing. In the indicated testing group, patients received indicated preoperative testing: a complete blood count, electrolytes, blood glucose, creatinine, electrocardiogram, and chest radiograph according to the Ontario Preoperative Testing Grid as per current practice, whereas in the no testing group, no testing was ordered. The investigators, data collectors, and patient outcome reviewers were blinded to the group assignment. The primary outcome measures were the rate of perioperative adverse events and the rates of adverse events within 7 and 30 days after surgery.

RESULTS: Patients’ age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, type of surgery, and anesthesia were similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the rates of perioperative adverse events and the rates of adverse events within 30 days after surgery between the no testing group and the indicated testing group. Hospital revisits 7 days were higher in the indicated testing group (P < 0.05). None of the adverse events were related to the indicated testing or no testing.

CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study showed that there was no increase in the perioperative adverse events as a result of no preoperative testing in our study population. A larger study is needed to demonstrate that indicated testing may be safely eliminated in selected patients undergoing ambulatory surgery without increasing perioperative complications.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. R. Pasternak Preoperative Testing: Moving from Individual Testing to Risk Management Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2009; 108(2): 393 - 394. [Full Text] [PDF]