This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huh, J. Articles by Kim, D.-K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huh, J. Articles by Kim, D.-K. Related Collections Airway Preoperative Evaluation Patient Safety

---

PATIENT SAFETY

Diagnostic Predictor of Difficult Laryngoscopy: The Hyomental Distance Ratio

Jin Huh, MD^*, Hwa-Yong Shin, MD, Seong-Hyop Kim, MD, Tae-Kyoon Yoon, MD, and Duk-Kyung Kim, MD

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Seoul National University Borame Municipal Hospital; and Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Duk-Kyung Kim, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 1 Hwayang-Dong, Gwanggin-Gu, Seoul 143-701, South Korea. Address e-mail to dikei{at}kuh.ac.kr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the usefulness of the hyomental distance (HMD) ratio (HMDR), defined as the ratio of the HMD at the extreme of head extension to that in the neutral position, in predicting difficult visualization of the larynx (DVL) in apparently normal patients, by examining the following preoperative airway predictors, alone and in combination: the modified Mallampati test, HMD in the neutral position, HMD and thyromental distance at the extreme of head extension and HMDR.

METHODS: Preoperatively, we assessed the five airway predictors in 213 adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. A single experienced anesthesiologist, blinded to the results of the airway evaluation, performed all of the direct laryngoscopies and graded the views using the modified Cormack and Lehane scale. DVL was defined as a Grade 3 or 4 view. The optimal cutoff points for each test were determined at the maximal point of the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curve. For the modified Mallampati test, Class 3 was predefined as a predictor of DVL.

RESULTS: The larynx was difficult to visualize in 26 (12.2%) patients. In univariate analyses, the HMD and thyromental distance at the extreme of head extension and the HMDR were significantly related to DVL. The HMDR with the optimal cutoff point of 1.2 had greater diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve of 0.782), than other single predictors (P < 0.05), and it alone showed a greater diagnostic validity profile (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 60%) than any test combinations.

CONCLUSIONS: The HMDR with a test threshold of 1.2 is a clinically reliable predictor of DVL.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Hyomental Distance Ratio Helps Predict Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, March 6, 2009; 2009(306): 2 - 2. [Full Text]