JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2009; 108:846-851
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818a9932
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, M. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Patient Safety
Right arrow Clinical Pharmacology
Right arrow Pharmacology


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

The Effect of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade on the Speed of Reversal with Sugammadex

Paul F. White, PhD, MD*, Burcu Tufanogullari, MD*, Ozlem Sacan, MD*, Edward G. Pavlin, MD{dagger}, Oscar J. Viegas, MD{ddagger}, Harold S. Minkowitz, MD§, and M. E. Hudson, MD||

From the *Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Texas; {dagger}Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; {ddagger}Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana; §Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Management Memorial Hermann Memorial City Hospital, Houston, Texas; and ||Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Management University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Paul F. White, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5161 Harry Hines Boulevard, CS 2. 282, Dallas, TX 75390-9068. Address e-mail to paul.white{at}utsouthwestern.edu.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex is a modified {gamma} cyclodextrin compound which encapsulates rocuronium resulting in rapid reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade. We performed a post hoc analysis of data from a multicenter study designed to mimic standard clinical practice which would test the hypothesis that the presence (versus the absence) of a twitch response to neuromuscular stimulation at the time of reversal drug administration would influence the speed and completeness of the reversal effect of sugammadex.

METHODS: One-hundred-seventy-one consenting patients undergoing general anesthesia with a volatile-based anesthetic technique were enrolled in a multicenter observational study. All patients received rocuronium, 0.6 mg/kg IV for tracheal intubation and maintenance boluses of 0.15 mg/kg IV as needed during surgery. The degree of rocuronium-induced blockade was assessed during anesthesia using a TOF-Watch®-SX acceleromyograph to record the train-of-four (TOF) responses on a laptop computer from induction of anesthesia until the TOF ratio returned to ≥0.9 after completion of the surgical procedure. The patients received sugammadex, 4 mg/kg IV, for reversal of neuromuscular blockade >15 min after the last dose of rocuronium. Recovery data were compared in patients with either no (0) (n = 89) or ≥1 twitch (n = 82) in response to TOF stimulation at the time of reversal drug administration.

RESULTS: The patients without a twitch response were more likely to be female (60% vs 40%) and had a shorter time interval between the last bolus dose of rocuronium and the administration of the reversal drug (31±18 vs 45±23 min, P < 0.05). The time to achieve a TOF ratio of 0.9 was prolonged in the 0 twitch group compared with the ≥1 twitch response group (173±162 vs 104±73 s, P < 0.05). Overall, 84% of the patients in the 0 twitch group recovered to a TOF of 0.9 in ≤5 min compared to 91% of the patients in the group with ≥1 twitch (P < 0.05). The times to achieve a TOF of 0.9 varied from 0.8 to 22.3 and 0.7 to 8.5 min in the 0 twitch and ≥1 twitch groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex was influenced by the degree of residual blockade at the time the reversal drug was administered. Despite the wide variability, reversal of the TOF ratio to 0.9 occurred ≤5 min in more than 80% of the patients regardless of the number of twitches at the time of reversal drug administration.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. J. Brull
Patient Safety Revisited: Reliability Is Paramount
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 702 - 703.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.