JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2009; 108:887-897
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818ffd99
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Funk, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Funk, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ambulatory
Right arrow Equipment
Right arrow Patient Safety
Right arrow Technology


TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

Minimally Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in the Perioperative Setting

Duane J. Funk, MD, FRCPC, Eugene W. Moretti, MD, MHsc, and Tong J. Gan, MB, MHS, FRCA, FFARCS(I)

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tong J. Gan, MB, FRCA, FFARCS(I), Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Address e-mail to gan00001{at}mc.duke.edu.

With advancing age and increased co-morbidities in patients, the need for monitoring devices during the perioperative period that allow clinicians to track physiologic variables, such as cardiac output (CO), fluid responsiveness and tissue perfusion, is increasing. Until recently, the only tool available to anesthesiologists to monitor CO was either a pulmonary artery catheter or transesophageal echocardiograph. These devices have their limitations and potential for morbidity. Several new devices (including esophageal Doppler monitors, pulse contour analysis, indicator dilution, thoracic bioimpedance and partial non-rebreathing systems) have recently been marketed which have the ability to monitor CO noninvasively and, in some cases, assess the patient’s ability to respond to fluid challenges. In this review, we will describe these new devices including the technology, studies on their efficacy and the limitations of their use.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. L. Archer, D. J. Funk, E. Moretti, and T. J. Gan
Stroke Volume Calculation by Esophageal Doppler Integrates Velocity Over Time and Multiplies This "Area Under The Curve" by the Cross Sectional Area of the Aorta
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2009; 109(3): 996 - 996.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. M. Feldman
Is It a Bird? Is It a Plane? The Role of Patient Monitors in Medical Decision Making
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 707 - 710.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.