JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2009; 108:997-1007
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819385e1
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perez-Castro, R.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perez-Castro, R.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanisms
Right arrow Pain Mechanisms
Right arrow Preclinical Pharmacology
Right arrow Pharmacology


ANALGESIA

Cytotoxicity of Local Anesthetics in Human Neuronal Cells

Rosalia Perez-Castro, MS*, Sohin Patel, MD*, Zayra V. Garavito-Aguilar, BS*, Andrew Rosenberg, MD{dagger}, Esperanza Recio-Pinto, PhD*, Jin Zhang, MD*, Thomas J. J. Blanck, MD, PhD*, and Fang Xu, PhD*

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, New York University School of Medicine; and {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Fang Xu, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Medical Center, 560 First Ave., Tisch Building, Rm. HE-438, New York, NY 10016. Address e-mail to fang.xu{at}nyumc.org.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In addition to inhibiting the excitation conduction process in peripheral nerves, local anesthetics (LAs) cause toxic effects on the central nervous system, cardiovascular system, neuromuscular junction, and cell metabolism. Different postoperative neurological complications are ascribed to the cytotoxicity of LAs, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Because the clinical concentrations of LAs far exceed their EC50 for inhibiting ion channel activity, ion channel block alone might not be sufficient to explain LA-induced cell death. However, it may contribute to cell death in combination with other actions. In this study, we compared the cytotoxicity of six frequently used LAs and will discuss the possible mechanism(s) underlying their toxicity.

METHODS: In human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, viability upon exposure to six LAs (bupivacaine, ropivacaine, mepivacaine, lidocaine, procaine, and chloroprocaine) was quantitatively determined by the MTT-(3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetra-odium bromide) colorimetry assay and qualitatively confirmed by fluorescence imaging, using the LIVE/DEAD® assay reagents (calcein/AM and ethidium homodimer-1). In addition, apoptotic activity was assessed by measuring the activation of caspase-3/-7 by imaging using a fluorescent caspase inhibitor (FLICATM). Furthermore, LA effects on depolarization- and carbachol-stimulated intracellular Ca2+-responses were also evaluated.

RESULTS: 1) After a 10-min treatment, all six LAs decreased cell viability in a concentration-dependent fashion. Their killing potency was procaine ≤ mepivacaine < lidocaine < chloroprocaine < ropivacaine < bupivacaine (based on LD50, the concentration at which 50% of cells were dead). Among these six LAs, only bupivacaine and lidocaine killed all cells with increasing concentration. 2) Both bupivacaine and lidocaine activated caspase-3/-7. Caspase activation required higher levels of lidocaine than bupivacaine. Moreover, the caspase activation by bupivacaine was slower than by lidocaine. Lidocaine at high concentrations caused an immediate caspase activation, but did not cause significant caspase activation at concentrations lower than 10 mM. 3) Procaine and chloroprocaine concentration-dependently inhibited the cytosolic Ca2+-response evoked by depolarization or receptor-activation in a similar manner as a previous observation made with bupivacaine, ropivacaine, mepivacaine, and lidocaine. None of the LAs caused a significant increase in the basal and Ca2+-evoked cytosolic Ca2+-level.

CONCLUSION: LAs can cause rapid cell death, which is primarily due to necrosis. Lidocaine and bupivacaine can trigger apoptosis with either increased time of exposure or increased concentration. These effects might be related to postoperative neurologic injury. Lidocaine, linked to the highest incidence of transient neurological symptoms, was not the most toxic LA, whereas bupivacaine, a drug causing a very low incidence of transient neurological symptoms, was the most toxic LA in our cell model. This suggests that cytotoxicity-induced nerve injury might have different mechanisms for different LAs and different target(s) other than neurons.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. Werdehausen, S. Fazeli, S. Braun, H. Hermanns, F. Essmann, M. W. Hollmann, I. Bauer, and M. F. Stevens
Apoptosis induction by different local anaesthetics in a neuroblastoma cell line
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2009; 103(5): 711 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.