Anesth Analg 2009; 108:1574-1582
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819e9e6c
PATIENT SAFETY
Modern Rapidly Degradable Hydroxyethyl Starches: Current Concepts
Joachim Boldt, MD
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Dr. Joachim Boldt, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany. Address e-mail to BoldtJ{at}gmx.net.
Abstract
Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is a widely used plasma substitute for correcting perioperative hypovolemia. HES preparations are defined by concentration, molar substitution (MS), mean molecular weight (Mw), the C2/C6 ratio of substitution, the solvent, and the origin. The possible unwanted side effects of HES are anaphylactic reactions, alterations of hemostasis resulting in increased bleeding, kidney dysfunction, accumulation, and pruritus. In view of the potential side effects, it is crucial to distinguish among the different HES preparations; all HES preparations are not the same. The first generation of HES preparation showing a high Mw (>450 kD) and a high MS (>0.7) was associated with negative effects with regard to coagulation, organ function, and accumulation. This review is focused on whether modern (third generation), more rapidly degradable HES preparations with a lower Mw (130 kD) and a lower MS (<0.5) are safer and have fewer side effects. Several studies demonstrated that such modern HES preparations appear to be safe with regard to hemostasis, kidney function, itching, and accumulation. Modern HES preparations are dissolved in balanced, plasma-adapted solutions that no longer contain unphysiological amounts of sodium and chloride and are thus suitable for correcting hypovolemia.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Nussmeier and B. E. Searles
The Next Generation of Colloids: Ready for "Prime Time"?
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2009;
109(6):
1715 - 1717.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Hartog and K. Reinhart
Modern Starches Are Not Safer than Old Ones
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 2009;
109(4):
1346 - 1346.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Wiedermann
Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4: Does "Modern" Mean Safe?
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 2009;
109(4):
1346 - 1347.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|