This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Connor, M. Articles by Harmon, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by O'Connor, M. Articles by Harmon, D. Related Collections Regional Anesthesia

---

ANALGESIA

An Anatomical Study of the Parasacral Block Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Healthy Volunteers

Maeve O'Connor, MB, BCh, BAO^*, Margaret Coleman, FFARCSI^*, Fintan Wallis, FRCR, and Dominic Harmon, MD, FCARCSI^*

From the Departments of *Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, and Radiology, Mid-Western Regional Hospital, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Dominic Harmon, MD, FCARCSI, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Mid-Western Regional Hospital, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland. Address e-mail to dominicharmon{at}hotmail.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The parasacral approach to sciatic blockade is reported to be easy to learn and perform, with a high success rate and few complications.

METHODS: Using magnetic resonance imaging, we evaluated the accuracy of a simulated needle (perpendicular to skin) in contacting the sacral plexus with this approach in 10 volunteers. Intrapelvic structures encountered during the simulated parasacral blocks were also recorded.

RESULTS: The sacral plexus was contacted by the simulated needle in 4 of the 10 volunteers, and the sciatic nerve itself in one volunteer. The plexus was accurately located adjacent to a variety of visceral structures, including small bowel, blood vessels, and ovary. In the remaining five volunteers (in whom the plexus was not contacted on first needle pass), small bowel, rectum, blood vessels, seminal vesicles, and bony structures were encountered. Historically, when plexus is not encountered, readjustment of the needle insertion point more caudally has been recommended. We found that such an adjustment resulted in simulated perforation of intrapelvic organs or the perianal fossa.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings question the reliability of the anatomical landmarks of the parasacral block and raise the possibility of frequent visceral puncture using this technique.