This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Bevilacqua, S. Articles by Gensini, G. F. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bevilacqua, S. Articles by Gensini, G. F. Related Collections Neuroanesthesia Anesthetic Techniques

---

NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE

Anesthesia for Carotid Endarterectomy: The Third Option. Patient Cooperation During General Anesthesia

Sergio Bevilacqua, MD^*, Stefano Romagnoli, MD^*, Francesco Ciappi, MD^*, Chiara Lazzeri, MD, Sandro Gelsomino, MD, Carlo Pratesi, MD, and Gian Franco Gensini, MD

From the Heart and Vessels Department, *Anesthesia and Postsurgical Intensive Care Unit, Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Surgery Unit, and Vascular Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sergio Bevilacqua, MD, Heart and Vessel Department, Anesthesia and Postsurgical Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Firenze, Italy. Address e-mail to sebevi{at}tin.it.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is typically performed using either regional or general anesthesia techniques, which exhibit several differences, especially regarding the intraoperative neurological monitoring of patients. In this study, we introduce a technique of general anesthesia (cooperative patient general anesthesia), which allows neurological monitoring of the awake patient during surgery.

METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 181 consecutive adult patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. Patients were anesthetized with a total IV anesthesia technique. During carotid clamping, anesthesia was reduced and maintained only with high-dose remifentanil, such that the patient was able to respond to verbal statements and neurological monitoring could be performed. The technique is described in detail. Patient neurological and cardiac outcomes were investigated. Patient and surgeon satisfaction with the technique were also evaluated.

RESULTS: General anesthesia with a cooperative patient was achieved in 179 patients. No postoperative neurological events were observed. Two (1.1%) nonfatal myocardial infarctions occurred in the early postoperative period in two patients. Eighty-one percent of patients described the operation duration as brief, whereas 19.3% accurately perceived the time they were conscious. Both patients and surgeons were highly satisfied with the technique.

CONCLUSIONS: In our series, cooperative patient general anesthesia proved to be a safe and satisfactory anesthetic technique for both the patient and surgeon. The technique was characterized by hemodynamic stability, excellent control of ventilatory pattern, continuous neurological monitoring, and immediate and safe conversion to general anesthesia whenever required. Further studies are needed to highlight the advantages of this technique compared with standard general and local anesthesia.