This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Liu, S. S. Articles by Ya Deau, J. T. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Liu, S. S. Articles by Ya Deau, J. T. Related Collections Complications Pain Medicine Patient Safety Regional Anesthesia

---

ANALGESIA

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound Versus Nerve Stimulator Guidance for Interscalene Block for Ambulatory Shoulder Surgery for Postoperative Neurological Symptoms

Spencer S. Liu, MD^*, Victor M. Zayas, MD^*, Michael A. Gordon, MD^*, Jonathan C. Beathe, MD^*, Daniel B. Maalouf, MD^*, Leonardo Paroli, MD^*, Gregory A. Liguori, MD^*, Jaime Ortiz, MD^*, Valeria Buschiazzo^*, Justin Ngeow, BA^*, Teena Shetty, MD, and Jacques T. Ya Deau, MD, PhD^*

From the Departments of *Anesthesiology, and Neurology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill College of Medicine of Cornell University, New York.

Address correspondence to Dr. Spenser S. Liu, Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St., New York City, NY 10021. Address e-mail to liusp{at}hss.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Visualization with ultrasound during regional anesthesia may reduce the risk of intraneural injection and subsequent neurological symptoms but has not been formally assessed. Thus, we performed this randomized clinical trial comparing ultrasound versus nerve stimulator-guided interscalene blocks for shoulder arthroscopy to determine whether ultrasound could reduce the incidence of postoperative neurological symptoms.

METHODS: Two hundred thirty patients were randomized to a standardized interscalene block with either ultrasound or nerve stimulator with a 5 cm, 22 g Stimuplex® insulated needle with 1.5% mepivacaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine and NaCO₃ (1 meq/10 mL). A standardized neurological assessment tool (questionnaire and physical examination) designed by a neurologist was administered before surgery (both components), at approximately 1 wk after surgery (questionnaire), and at approximately 4–6 weeks after surgery (both components). Diagnosis of postoperative neurological symptoms was determined by a neurologist blinded to block technique.

RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen patients were evaluated. Use of ultrasound decreased the number of needle passes for block performance (1 vs 3, median, P < 0.001), enhanced motor block at the 5-min assessment (P = 0.04) but did not decrease block performance time (5 min for both). No patient required conversion to general anesthesia for failed block, and patient satisfaction was similar in both groups (96% nerve stimulator and 92% ultrasound). The incidence of postoperative neurological symptoms was similar at 1 wk follow-up with 11% (95% CI of 5%–17%) for nerve stimulator and 8% (95% CI of 3%–13%) for ultrasound and was similar at late follow-up with 7% (95% CI of 3%–12%) for nerve stimulator and 6% (95% CI of 2%–11%) for ultrasound. The severity of postoperative neurological symptoms was similar between groups with a median patient rating of moderate. Symptoms were primarily sensory and consisted of pain, tingling, or paresthesias.

CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound reduced the number of needle passes needed to perform interscalene block and enhanced motor block at the 5 min assessment; however, we did not observe significant differences in block failures, patient satisfaction or incidence, and severity of postoperative neurological symptoms.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. A. Williams, S. L. Orebaugh, M. L. Kentor, A. Hadzic, P. Marhofer, and (on behalf of all co-authors) Economic aspects of regional anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2009; 103(4): 613 - 614. [Full Text] [PDF]