JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2009; 109:311-319
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a90adc
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Doroski, V.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Doroski, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Critical Care
Right arrow Postanesthetic Care Unit
Right arrow Clinical Pharmacology
Right arrow Pharmacology


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY

Morphine-Based Cardiac Anesthesia Provides Superior Early Recovery Compared with Fentanyl in Elective Cardiac Surgery Patients

Glenn S. Murphy, MD, Joseph W. Szokol, MD, Jesse H. Marymont, MD, Steven B. Greenberg, MD, Michael J. Avram, PhD, Jeffery S. Vender, MD, Saadia S. Sherwani, MD, Margarita Nisman, BA, and Victoria Doroski, BA

From the Department of Anesthesiology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Glenn S. Murphy, MD, NorthShore Department of Anesthesiology, University HealthSystem, 2650 Ridge Ave., Evanston, IL 60201. Address e-mail to dgmurphy2{at}yahoo.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical data suggest that morphine possesses unique cardioprotective and antiinflammatory properties. In this clinical investigation, we sought to determine whether the choice of intraoperative opioid (morphine or fentanyl) influences early recovery after cardiac surgery.

METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized to receive either morphine (40 mg) or fentanyl (600 µg) as part of a standardized opioid-isoflurane anesthetic. Quality of recovery was assessed using the QoR-40 questionnaire administered preoperatively and daily on postoperative days 1-3. During the first three postoperative days, pain was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale, and the use of IV and oral pain medications (morphine or acetaminophen/hydrocodone) was quantified. Hemodynamic variables, duration of tracheal intubation, postoperative febrile reactions, organ morbidities, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay were evaluated.

RESULTS: Compared with patients given fentanyl, those receiving morphine had higher global QoR-40 scores on postoperative days 1 (173 vs 160, P < 0.0001), 2 (174 vs 164, P < 0.0001), and 3 (177 vs 167, P < 0.001). Differences between the groups were observed in the QoR-40 dimensions of emotional state, physical comfort, and pain (all P < 0.01-0.0001). Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, use of pain medication in the ICU and surgical ward, and postoperative febrile reactions were reduced significantly in the morphine group (all P < 0.01). No differences between the groups were noted in duration of tracheal intubation, ICU and hospital length of stay, or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, postoperative quality-of-life measures and pain control during recovery were enhanced when morphine (40 mg) was administered intraoperatively as part of a balanced anesthetic technique compared with fentanyl.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. Groban and J. Butterworth
Fentanyl: Destiny or Devil?
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 301 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.