JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2009; 109:340-353
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181aa0af3
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Course on Perioperative Hemodynamic Monitoring with Transesophageal Doppler Technology
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schober, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarte, L. A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schober, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarte, L. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Monitoring (Cardiac)
Right arrow Technology


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY

Perioperative Hemodynamic Monitoring with Transesophageal Doppler Technology

Patrick Schober, MD, Stephan A. Loer, MD, PhD, MSc, and Lothar A. Schwarte, MD, PhD, DESA, EDIC

From the Department of Anesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Lothar A. Schwarte, MD, PhD, DESA, EDIC, Department of Anesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Address e-mail to L.Schwarte{at}vumc.nl.

Abstract

Invasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring, traditionally performed with transpulmonary thermodilution techniques, is usually reserved for high-risk patients because of the inherent risks of these methods. In contrast, transesophageal Doppler (TED) technology offers a safe, quick, and less invasive method for routine measurements of CO. After esophageal insertion and focusing of the probe, the Doppler beam interrogates the descending aortic blood flow. On the basis of the measured frequency shift between the emitted and received ultrasound frequency, blood flow velocity is determined. From this velocity, combined with the simultaneously measured systolic ejection time, CO and other advanced hemodynamic variables can be calculated, including estimations of preload, afterload, and contractility. Numerous studies have validated TED-derived CO against reference methods. Although the agreement of CO values between TED and the reference methods is limited (95% limits of agreement: median 4.2 L/min, interquartile range 3.3–5.0 L/min), TED has been shown to accurately follow changes of CO over time, making it a useful device for trend monitoring. TED can be used to guide perioperative intravascular volume substitution and therapy, with vasoactive or inotropic drugs. Various studies have demonstrated a reduced postoperative morbidity and shorter length of hospital stay in patients managed with TED compared with conventional clinical management, suggesting that it may be a valuable supplement to standard perioperative monitoring. We review not only the technical basis of this method and its clinical application but also its limitations, risks, and contraindications.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.