JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2009; 109:434-440
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181aa5cdb
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uchiyama, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fujino, Y.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Uchiyama, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fujino, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Postanesthetic Care Unit
Right arrow Ventilation
Right arrow Technology


TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

An Expiratory Assist During Spontaneous Breathing Can Compensate for Endotracheal Tube Resistance

Akinori Uchiyama, MD, PhD, Cheng Chang, MD, Shinya Suzuki, BS, Takashi Mashimo, MD, PhD, and Yuji Fujino, MD, PhD

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka, Suita, Japan.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Akinori Uchiyama, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka Prefecture 565-0871, Japan. Address e-mail to auchiyama{at}hp-icu.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.

BACKGROUND: Although inspiratory assist of spontaneous breathing in intubated patients is common, expiratory assist functions have rarely been reported. Effective expiratory support (ES) could be used to compensate for endotracheal tube (ETT) resistance during spontaneous breathing. In this study, we examined the performance of a new system designed to provide both inspiratory support (IS) and ES during spontaneous breathing with the goal of reducing the effective resistance of the ETT.

METHODS: The ES system consisted of a ventilator demand valve and a computer-controlled piston cylinder, which aspirated gas from the respiratory circuit during the expiratory phase. The movement of the piston was synchronized with spontaneous breathing. We compared the pressures at the tip of the ETT and in the breathing circuit during spontaneous breathing through an ETT of internal diameter (ID) 5 mm with that of an ETT with ID 8 mm in nine healthy adult male volunteers. The ventilatory mode was set to maintain a continuous airway pressure of 0 cm H2O. Three ventilator settings (no support, IS only, and IS plus ES) were compared using ID 5 mm ETT.

RESULTS: We monitored pressure in the breathing circuit (Paw), ETT tip pressure (Ptip), and respiratory flow. The Ptip of the ID 5 mm ETT showed a large negative deflection during inspiration and a positive deflection during expiration without support. IS alone did not improve the respiratory pattern through the small ETT. However, IS plus ES resulted in negative Paw during expiration in addition to positive deflection of Paw during inspiration, making the pressure characteristics of Ptip similar to those of ID 8 mm ETT. Moreover, IS plus ES produced a respiratory pattern through the ID 5 mm ETT that was similar to that through the ID 8 mm ETT.

CONCLUSIONS: In this study of healthy volunteers, IS plus ES compensated for the airway resistance imposed by a ID 5.0 mm ETT to create pressure changes at the tip of the ETT similar to those of an ID 8.0 mm ETT.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.