This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ane.0b013e31819518e4v1 109/2/524    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Ross, V. H. Articles by Eisenach, J. C. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ross, V. H. Articles by Eisenach, J. C. Related Collections Obstetrics Pain Medicine Pain Pharmacology

---

OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY

Neostigmine Decreases Bupivacaine Use by Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labor: A Randomized Controlled Study

Vernon H. Ross, MD^*, Peter H. Pan, MD^*, Medge D. Owen, MD^*, Melvin H. Seid, MD, Lynne Harris, RN^*, Brittany Clyne, MD^*, Misa Voltaire, MD^*, and James C. Eisenach, MD^*

From the Departments of *Anesthesiology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, North Carolina.

Address correspondence to Dr. Peter H. Pan, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. Address e-mail to ppan{at}wfubmc.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal neostigmine not only produces analgesia but also severe nausea. In contrast, epidural neostigmine enhances opioid and local anesthetic analgesia without causing nausea. Previous studies examined only single epidural neostigmine bolus administration and did not assess the efficacy of continuous epidural infusion or several aspects of maternal and fetal safety. We therefore tested the hypothesis that epidural neostigmine in combination with bupivacaine by continuous infusion during labor would reduce the amount of bupivacaine required.

METHODS: Twelve healthy women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were assigned to receive epidural neostigmine, 40 µg (first six subjects) or 80 µg (second six subjects) as a single bolus, with fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine contractions monitored for 20 min. In a subsequent experiment, 40 healthy laboring women were randomized to receive bupivacaine 1.25 mg/mL alone or with neostigmine 4 µg/mL by patient-controlled epidural analgesia. The primary outcome measure was hourly bupivacaine use.

RESULTS: Epidural neostigmine bolus did not alter baseline FHR, induce contractions, or produce nausea. Epidural neostigmine infusion reduced bupivacaine requirement by 19% in all patients and 25% in those with >4 h of treatment (P < 0.05 for both) but might have contributed to the incidence of mild sedation. Mode of delivery, incidence of maternal nausea, and FHR abnormality were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS: These data show that adding epidural neostigmine 4 µg/mL reduces the hourly bupivacaine requirement by 19%–25% with patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Administered as a bolus and by continuous infusion at the studied doses, epidural neostigmine does not cause nausea and does not induce uterine contractions or FHR abnormalities, but mild sedation can occur.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Wong Labor Analgesia: Is There an Ideal Technique? Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 296 - 298. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. W. Schultheis, B. M. Nikhar, R. D. Mellon, S. Doddapaneni, D. D. Christodoulo, R. Roca, and B. A. Rappaport Clinical Investigation of Neuraxially Administered Drugs: A Regulatory Perspective Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 299 - 300. [Full Text] [PDF]