This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the course for this article: Course on Outcomes for Anesthesiologists with Substance Use Disorders Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Skipper, G. E. Articles by DuPont, R. L. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Skipper, G. E. Articles by DuPont, R. L. Related Collections Economics and Health Care Research Outcomes Patient Safety Anesthesia Practice

---

ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND POLICY

Anesthesiologists with Substance Use Disorders: A 5-Year Outcome Study from 16 State Physician Health Programs

Gregory E. Skipper, MD^*, Michael D. Campbell, PhD, and Robert L. DuPont, MD

From the *Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Montgomery, Alabama; and Institute for Behavior and Health, Rockville, Maryland.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Gregory E. Skipper, MD, 19 S Jackson St., Montgomery, AL 36117. Address e-mail to gregskipper{at}usa.net.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anesthesiologists have a higher rate of substance use disorders than other physicians, and their prognoses and advisability to return to anesthesiology practice after treatment remain controversial. Over the past 25 yr, physician health programs (PHPs), created under authority of state medical regulatory boards, have become primary resources for management and monitoring of physicians with substance abuse and other mental health disorders.

METHODS: We conducted a 5-yr, longitudinal, cohort study involving 904 physicians consecutively admitted to 1 of 16 state PHPs between 1995 and 2001. This report analyzed a subset of the data involving the 102 anesthesiologists among the subjects and compared them with other physicians. The main outcome measures included relapse (defined as any unauthorized addictive substance use, including alcohol), return to anesthesiology practice, disciplinary actions, physician death, and patient harm.

RESULTS: Anesthesiologists were significantly less likely to enroll in a PHP because of alcohol abuse (odds ratio [OR] 0.4 [confidence interval {CI}: 0.2–0.6], P < 0.001) and much more likely to enroll because of opioid abuse (OR 2.8 [CI: 1.7–4.4], P < 0.001). Anesthesiologists had a higher rate of IV drug use, 41% vs 10% (OR 6.3 [CI: 3.8–10.7], P < 0.001). During similar periods of monitoring, anesthesiologists received more drug tests, 101 vs 82 (mean difference = 19 [CI: 3–35], P = 0.02); however, anesthesiologists were less likely to fail at least one drug test during monitoring, 11% vs 23% (OR 0.4 [CI: 0.2–0.9], P = 0.02). There was no statistical difference among rates of program completion, disciplinary actions, return to practice, or deaths, and there was no report of significant patient harm from relapse in any record.

CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiologists in our sample treated and monitored for substance disorders under supervision of PHPs had excellent outcomes similar to other physicians, with no higher mortality, relapse rate, or disciplinary rate and no evidence in their records of patient harm. It is postulated that differences of study design account for contradictory conclusions from other reports.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. H. Berge Confrontational Approach Has No Role in Addressing Physician Addiction-Reply-I Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2009; 84(11): 1042 - 1043. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. G. Fitzsimons and K. H. Baker Not All Strikes Are Easy to Call Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2009; 109(3): 693 - 694. [Full Text] [PDF]