This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Ellinas, E. H. Articles by Ebert, T. J. PubMed Articles by Ellinas, E. H. Articles by Ebert, T. J. Related Collections Obstetrics Preoperative Evaluation Regional Anesthesia

---

OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY

The Effect of Obesity on Neuraxial Technique Difficulty in Pregnant Patients: A Prospective, Observational Study

Elizabeth H. Ellinas, MD^*, Daniel C. Eastwood, MS, Smita N. Patel, MD^*, Anita M. Maitra-D’Cruze, MD^*, and Thomas J. Ebert, MD, PhD^*

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin; Department of Obstetric Anesthesiology, Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare–St. Joseph; Division of Biostatistics, Biostatistics Consulting Service, Medical College of Wisconsin; and Department of Anesthesiology, Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Elizabeth H. Ellinas, MD, Department of Obstetric Anesthesiology, Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare–St. Joseph, 5000 W. Chambers St., Milwaukee, WI 53222. Address e-mail to libby{at}mcw.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Practitioners often presuppose that obesity will increase neuraxial technique difficulty in pregnant patients, but few investigators have systematically examined this population for risk factors associated with difficult epidural or spinal needle placement. We designed this study to prospectively identify factors that predict neuraxial technique difficulty in pregnant patients.

METHODS: Using a prospective, observational format, pregnant patients were examined for multiple potential risk factors for neuraxial technique difficulty, including current body mass index, ability to palpate spinous processes, maximum back flexion, scoliosis, and experience of the practitioner. Neuraxial technique difficulty was then assessed using two measures: 1) the number of needle passes needed to reach the desired space, and 2) the placement time from skin infiltration to either spinal injection or epidural catheter threading. Predictors of total needle passes were determined by fitting the data to a generalized linear model with negative binomial error. Predictors of neuraxial anesthetic time were determined by fitting a linear model to the log of neuraxial anesthetic placement time. A survival model was used to account for bias introduced when attending physicians intervened in resident physician procedures.

RESULTS: Neuraxial procedures in 427 pregnant patients were studied. For both the number of needle passes and the neuraxial anesthetic placement time, the significant predictors of difficulty were the practitioner’s ability to palpate the patient’s bony landmarks and the patient’s ability to flex her back. Obesity, as measured by body mass index, was not an independent predictor of either end point. Obesity did, however, strongly predict both the ability to palpate landmarks and flex the back.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns that obesity may cause difficulty with neuraxial technique, some obese patients have surprisingly easy neuraxial block placements. When approaching any neuraxial anesthetic in a pregnant patient, and especially in the obese parturient, back flexion and landmark palpation predict neuraxial technique difficulty.