This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Yoshida, T. Articles by Kan, M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yoshida, T. Articles by Kan, M. Related Collections Critical Care Ventilation Technology

---

CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

The Impact of Spontaneous Ventilation on Distribution of Lung Aeration in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Versus Pressure Support Ventilation

Takeshi Yoshida, MD^*, Hiroshi Rinka, MD, Arito Kaji, MD, Akira Yoshimoto, MD, Hideki Arimoto, MD, Toshinori Miyaichi, MD, PhD, and Masanori Kan, MD, PhD

From the *Intensive Care Unit, Osaka University Hospital, Suita; and Emergency and Critical Care Medical Center, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Takeshi Yoshida, MD, Intensive Care Unit, Osaka University Hospital, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. Address e-mail to doctor{at}mvj.biglobe.ne.jp.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to determine which mode, airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) or pressure support ventilation (PSV), decreases atelectasis more in patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS: This was a retrospective study in the intensive care unit. Between 2006 and 2007, we identified 18 patients with acute lung injury/ARDS who received either APRV or PSV and had a helical computed tomography scan twice in 3 days.

RESULTS: Computed tomography data from the APRV and PSV groups (n = 9 each) were analyzed for 3-dimensional reconstruction and volumetry. Aerated lung regions (normally aerated, poorly aerated, nonaerated, and hyperinflated) were identified by their densities in Hounsfield units. The Pao₂/Fio₂ ratio and alveolar-arteriolar oxygen gradient after ventilation were improved in both groups (P = 0.008); however, the improvements in the APRV group exceeded those in the PSV group when delivered with equal mean airway pressure (P = 0.018 and 0.015, respectively). Atelectasis decreased significantly from 41% (range, 17%–68%) to 19% (range, 6%–40%) (P = 0.008) and normally aerated volume increased significantly from 29% (range, 13%–41%) to 43% (range, 25%–56%) (P = 0.008) in the APRV group, whereas lung volume did not change in the PSV group.

CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous ventilation during APRV improves lung aeration by decreasing atelectasis. PSV for gas exchange is effective but not sufficient to improve lung aeration. These results indicate that APRV is more efficient than PSV as a mode of primary ventilatory support to decrease atelectasis in patients with ARDS.