JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2009; 109:1930-1934
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bc3584
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ko, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Leffert, L. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ko, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Leffert, L. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Preoperative Evaluation
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY

Clinical Implications of Neuraxial Anesthesia in the Parturient with Scoliosis

James Y. Ko, MD, MPH, and Lisa R. Leffert, MD

From the Division of Obstetric Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Lisa R. Leffert, MD, Division of Obstetric Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114. Address e-mail to lleffert{at}partners.org.

Abstract

Scoliosis can pose challenges to the initiation and function of neuraxial anesthetics. We reviewed the available literature exploring neuraxial techniques in parturients with uncorrected or corrected (i.e., surgically instrumented) scoliosis. The 22 articles reported 117 attempted neuraxial procedures (uncorrected n = 24 and corrected n = 93). Of these procedures, 79% of uncorrected patients and 69% of corrected patients were successfully managed with neuraxial anesthesia. Procedures were typically more challenging in corrected patients; 90% of all reported difficulties in this subgroup involved epidural anesthetics. Complications were reported in 3 of 103 patients. We provide suggestions for optimizing efficacy of neuraxial techniques in these patients.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.