JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1976; 55:135-138
© 1976 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MALLOW, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by TARHAN, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MALLOW, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by TARHAN, S.

Hemodynamic Effects of Isoflurane and Halothane in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

JAMES E. MALLOW, MD*, ROGER D. WHITE, MD{dagger}, ROY F. CUCCHIARA, MD{dagger}, and SAIT TARHAN, MD{dagger}

*Resident, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55901. {dagger}Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55901.

Abstract

In 12 patients undergoing saphenous vein coronary artery bypass operations cardiovascular hemodynamics were studied in the awake state (control) and during anesthesia with isoflurane (inspired concentration, 1.24%, 7 patients) or with halothane (inspired concentration, 0.77%, 5 patients). Isoflurane anesthesia was accompanied by decreases of 19% in the cardiac in- dex (Formula ), 19% in mean arterial pressure



Formula 1

and 16% in heart rate (HR). Only the change in



Formula 2

was statistically significant. Halothane anesthesia was accompanied by decreases in Formula (28%)



Formula 3

(22%), and HR (10%). The changes in Formula and



Formula 4

were significant. HR did not change significantly following the induction of anesthesia with either agent. The decrease in



Formula 5

was similar with both agents, and, in this regard, neither agent was clearly superior for patients with occlusive coronary artery disease.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1976 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1976 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.