JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1980; 59:435-437
© 1980 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bedford, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bedford, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, A.

Lidocaine or Thiopental for Rapid Control of Intracranial Hypertension?

Robert F. Bedford, MD*, John A. Persing, MD{dagger}, Louis Pobereskin, MD{dagger}, and Albert Butler, MD{ddagger}

*Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Neurological Surgery The Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. {dagger}Research Fellow, Department of Neurological Surgery, The Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. {ddagger}Associate Professor of Neurological Surgery, The Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908.

Abstract

The effectiveness of intravenously administered lidocaine for rapid control of acute intracranial hypertension was compared to the effectiveness of thiopental in 20 patients with brain tumors undergoing craniotomy. Despite normal radial arterial and intracranial pressures (ICP) after induction of N2O-O2-morphine anesthesia, mean ICP increased from 13.8 torr ± 1.5 SE to 31 torr ± 2.3 SE (p < 0.001) in response to application of a pin-holder or scalp incision. To treat the elevated ICP a bolus injection of lidocaine, 1.5 mg/kg IV, was given to 10 patients, whereas the other 10 received thiopental, 3 mg/kg IV. Lidocaine reduced ICP 15.7 torr ± 5.6 SE (p < 0.025) but did not significantly affect mean arterial pressure. In contrast, thiopental lowered ICP 18.4 torr ± 9.6 SE (p < 0.02) and also lowered mean arterial pressure by 26.1 torr ± 9.6 SE (p < 0.025). Mean time for injection of medication to ICP nadir was 66 seconds ± 10 SE after lidocaine versus 48 seconds ± 9 SE after thiopental (p > 0.20). It is concluded that lidocaine is as effective as thiopental for rapid reduction of intraoperative intracranial hypertension but that it causes less cardiovascular depression. Lidocaine may be of particular benefit to patients with both intracranial hypertension and marginal circulatory function.

Key Words: ANESTHESIA: neurosurgical • BRAIN: intracranial pressure • ANESTHETICS, Local: lidocaine • ANESTHETICS, Intravenous: thiopental.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1980 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1980 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.