JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1983; 62:931-935
© 1983 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheskey, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Covino, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheskey, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Covino, B. G.

A Dose-Response Study of Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia

M. C. Sheskey, MD, G. Rocco, MD, M. Bizzarri-Schmid, MD, D. M. Francis, MD, H. Edstrom, PhD, and B. G. Covino, PhD, MD

Received from the Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

A randomized double-blind study was performed to elucidate the interrelationships among volume, concentration, and dosage of bupivacaine adminstered intrathecally. Sixty male patients between the ages of 40 and 80 years having transurethral surgery in the lithotomy position were studied using 10-, 15-, and 20-mg doses of glucose-free bupivacaine as either a 0.5 or a 0.75% solution. Success rate, time of onset and duration of anaglesia and motor block, and cardiovascular responses were assessed. It was found that both 15 and 20 mg of either concentration of bupivacaine provide satisfactory spinal anesthesia for transurethral urologic procedures. However, three of 20 patients receiving the 10-mg dose required supplementation with general anesthesia. Comparison of various volumes and concentrations of bupivacaine indicates that total dosage of bupivacaine is more important than volume or concentration. In several patients with sensory block involving cervical dermatomes, there was no significant hypotension or bradycardia, which suggests that cardiac output and venous return were maintained, perhaps because of the use of lithotomy position.

Key Words: ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES: spinal • ANESTHETICS, Local: bupivacaine




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. T. Kawamata, K. Nishikawa, T. Kawamata, K. Omote, M. Igarashi, M. Yamauchi, K. Sato, M. Nakayama, and A. Namiki
A Comparison of Hyperbaric 1% and 3% Solutions of Small-Dose Lidocaine in Spinal Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2003; 96(3): 881 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1983 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.