JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1983; 62:375-379
© 1983 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Covino, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Covino, B. G.

Comparative CNS Toxicity of Lidocaine, Etidocaine, Bupivacaine, and Tetracaine in Awake Dogs Following Rapid Intravenous Administration

Philip L. Liu, MD, Hal S. Feldman, BSc, Robert Giasi, MD, M. Kay Patterson, MD, and Benjamin G. Covino, PhD, MD

Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, and the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts. Presented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Abstract

The comparative central nervous system (CNS) toxicity of serially administered intravenous doses of lidocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, and tetracaine was investigated in awake dogs. The mean cumulative dose required for convulsive activity was 4.0 mg/kg tetracaine, 5.0 mg/kg bupivacaine, 8.0 mg/kg etidocaine, and 22.0 mg/kg lidocaine. The cumulative convulsive dose of lidocaine was significantly greater than that of the other three agents (P < 0.01). A comparison of the in vivo anesthetic potency and the acute CNS toxicity of these various agents suggests little difference in the therapeutic ratio between less potent anesthetics such as lidocaine and more potent drugs, i.e., tetracaine, bupivacaine, and etidocaine. The relative CNS toxicity of the different agents as determined in awake dogs in this study was compared with their relative cardiovascular toxicity previously evaluated in a series of ventilated dogs anesthetized with pentobarbital. The dose of lidocaine, etidocaine, tetracaine, and bupivacaine required to produce irreversible cardiovascular depression was 3.5–6.7 times greater than that which produced convulsions. These results suggest that the CNS is the primary target organ for the toxic effects of both highly lipid-soluble and highly protein-bound local anesthetics (i.e., bupivacaine, etidocaine, and tetracaine) and less lipid-soluble and less protein-bound drugs (i.e., lidocaine) following rapid intravenous administration.

Key Words: ANESTHETICS • Local: lidocaine • bupivacaine • etidocaine • tetracaine • TOXICITY: local anesthetics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. I. Eger II, D. E. Raines, S. L. Shafer, H. C. Hemmings Jr, and J. M. Sonner
Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility?
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 832 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. P. Hansen, C. L. Beck, E. P. Beck, and R. W. Townsley
Postarthroscopic Glenohumeral Chondrolysis
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1628 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. Groban, D. D. Deal, J. C. Vernon, R. L. James, and J. Butterworth
Ventricular Arrhythmias With or Without Programmed Electrical Stimulation After Incremental Overdosage with Lidocaine, Bupivacaine, Levobupivacaine, and Ropivacaine
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(5): 1103 - 1111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1983 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.