JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1983; 62:831-835
© 1983 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michaels, I. A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barash, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michaels, I. A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barash, P. G.

Hemodynamic Changes during Protamine Administration

Ira A. L. Michaels, MD, PhD, and Paul G. Barash, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Abstract

Hemodynamic responses to intravenous protamine sulfate in 40 patients were evaluated. The dose of protamine administered was calculated as adequate to reverse residual heparin as measured by the activated clotting time (ACT). Thirty patients (n = 30) received protamine at a rate of 0.5 mg/kg/min and the remainder (n - 10) received protamine at a rate of 1 mg/kg/min. Hemodynamic measurements were made before protamine, at 5-min intervals during administration, and 5 min after completion of the infusion. No statistically significant changes in cardiac output, systemic arterial blood pressure, or vascular resistance were seen when protamine was administered to patients with good left ventricular function after cardiopulmonary bypass. However, in patients with poor left ventricular function after cardiopulmonary bypass, protamine infusion was associated with systemic vasodilation that was only partially compensated for by an increase in cardiac index, resulting in a 12% decrease in mean blood pressure (P < 0.05). Thus protamine should be administered cautiously to patients who have poor left ventricular function after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Key Words: BLOOD, Coagulation: protamine • SURGERY: cardiovascular




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
S. Fehmi Katircioglu, T. Ulus, B. Yamak, Z. Saritas, and U. Yildiz
Experimental Inhibition of Protamine Cardiotoxicity by Prostacyclin
Angiology, November 1, 1999; 50(11): 929 - 935.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. B. Hird, T. W. Wakefield, R. Mukherjee, B. U. Jones, F. A. Crawford, P. C. Andrews, J. C. Stanley, and F. G. Spinale
Direct Effects of Protamine Sulfate on Myocyte Contractile Processes : Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms
Circulation, November 1, 1995; 92(9): 433 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
C. Aren
Review article : Heparin and protamine during cardiac surgery
Perfusion, July 1, 1989; 4(3): 171 - 181.
[PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1983 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.