JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1983; 62:836-840
© 1983 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westenskow, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westenskow, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. K.

Feedback Control of Enflurane Delivery in Dogs—Inspired Compared to End-Tidal Control

Dwayne R. Westenskow, PhD, William S. Jordan, MD, and John K. Hayes, MS

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah College of Medicine, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132.

Abstract

A technique was studied for the rapid induction of anesthesia in a closed rebreathing circuit using feedback control of endtidal enflurane concentration. This technique was compared to anesthetic induction using a constant inspired concentration. In one group of seven dogs, end-tidal enflurane concentration was maintained at 2.0%. Electronic feedback control automatically decreased the inspired concentration from a maximum of 3.7% to 2.1% during a 4-hr period. In the second group of seven dogs, the inspired enflurane concentration was 2.0% throughout the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to enflurane uptake, heart rate, blood pressure, or cardiac output. Enflurane uptake was higher in the first group only during the first 6 min after induction. The induction technique that used feedback control to automatically adjust the inspired enflurane concentration appeared to have no adverse cardiovascular effects beyond those present during an induction using a constant inspired concentration.

Key Words: ANESTHETICS, Volatile: enflurane • INDUCTION: anesthesia




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. J. Sieber, C. W. Frei, M. Derighetti, P. Feigenwinter, D. Leibundgut, and A. M. Zbinden
Model-based automatic feedback control versus human control of end-tidal isoflurane concentration using low-flow anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2000; 85(6): 818 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1983 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.