| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Recieved from the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and the Department of Anesthesiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Abstract
One hundred ninety people attending an anesthesia meeting were given ten minutes to identify five faults intentionally created in a standard anesthesia machine. 7.3% of participants found no machine faults and 3.4% found all five faults. The average number of identified faults was 2.2. Professional background did not influence the scores, but fault detection ability was increased in practitioners with ten years or more of experience. Concealed faults that did not make the machine inoperable were most frequently missed. Greater emphasis should be placed on aggressive system checking in education programs and in daily clinical practice.
Key Words: EQUIPMENT—anesthesia machines
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. R. Larson, G. A. Nuttall, B. D. Ogren, D. D. Severson, S. A. Wood, L. C. Torsher, W. C. Oliver, and M. E. S. Marienau A Prospective Study on Anesthesia Machine Fault Identification Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2007; 104(1): 154 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|