JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1984; 63:915-918
© 1984 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gross, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffer, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gross, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffer, D. W.

A Suitable Substitute for 4% Cocaine before Blind Nasotracheal Intubation

3% Lidocaine–0.25% Phenylephrine Nasal Spray

Jeffrey B. Gross, MD, Michele L. Hartigan, BS, CRNA, and David W. Schaffer, MD

Departments of Anesthesia, Nazareth Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, and Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of potential substitutes for cocaine as a topical anesthetic before nasal intubation, the authors performed a double-blind study comparing the hemodynamic effects of blind nasotracheal intubation in 75 patients receiving one of three nasal sprays: 4% cocaine (C), a mixture of 3% lidocaine in 0.25% phenylephrine (L-P), and 0.25% phenylephrine alone (P). Three minutes after 0.5 ml of one of the solutions was sprayed into each nostril, anesthesia and paralysis were induced with thiopental (5 mg/kg) followed by succinylcholine (1 mg/kg); immediately after induction, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded. After blind nasotracheal intubation was accomplished, MAP and HR were recorded for 5 min while anesthesia was maintained with 70% N2O in O2.

In patients receiving L-P, mean MAP during the 5 min after intubation decreased 2.3 ± 2.2 mm Hg (x ± SEM); this was significantly different from the increase of 6.2 ± 1.7 and 8.5 ± 2.0 mm Hg in MAP after intubation of patients receiving C and P, respectively (P < 0.005). Although mean HR decreased during the 5 min after intubation in all groups, this decrease was significantly greater (9.6 ± 1.4 beats/min) in patients receiving L-P than in those receiving C (3.1 ± 1.6 beats/min) or P (0.1 ± 1.7 beats/min) (P < 0.005). Changes in HR and MAP were similar in patients receiving C and P. There was no significant difference in the incidence or severity of epistaxis among the three groups. The authors conclude that for nasotracheal intubation, topical 3% lidocaine in 0.25% phenylephrine is as effective as 4% cocaine. Because of cocaine's toxicity and the potential for its abuse, the use of a lido-caine-phenylephrine mixture should be encouraged.

Key Words: ANESTHETICS LOCAL-cocaine lidocaine • INTUBATION—nasotracheal




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
Y. Morimoto, M. Sugimura, Y. Hirose, K. Taki, and H. Niwa
Nasotracheal intubation under curve-tipped suction catheter guidance reduces epistaxis: [L'intubation nasotracheale guidee par un catheter d'aspiration a extremite cour-bee reduit l'epistaxis].
Can J Anesth, March 1, 2006; 53(3): 295 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Kihara, T. Komatsuzaki, J. R. Brimacombe, Y. Yaguchi, N. Taguchi, and S. Watanabe
A Silicone-Based Wire-Reinforced Tracheal Tube with a Hemispherical Bevel Reduces Nasal Morbidity for Nasotracheal Intubation
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2003; 97(5): 1488 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Atlas and T. Mort
Placement of the Esophageal Doppler Ultrasound Monitor Probe in Awake Patients
Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1): 319 - 319.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1984 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.