JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1985; 64:415-419
© 1985 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benzon, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Molloy, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benzon, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Molloy, R. E.

Sign of Complete Sympathetic Blockade

Sweat Test or Sympathogalvanic Response?

Honorio T. Benzon, MD, S. C. Cheng, PhD, Michael J. Avram, PhD, and Robert E. Molloy, MD

Department of Anesthesia, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.

Abstract

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the cobalt blue and ninhydrin sweat tests were compared with the sympathogalvanic response (SGR) in assessment of complete sympathetic blockade. Patients were randomly assigned to receive epidural administration of either preservative-free physiologic saline solution and 80 mg methylprednisolone (group I, control group, 9 patients) or 1.5% lidocaine with 80 mg methylprednisolone (group II, sympathetic blocked group, 10 patients). In group I, there was one false positive SGR (absence of SGR) before the block and there were four false positive SGRs after the block. In comparison, there were no false positive sweat tests (absence of sweating) before and after injection in group I. In group II, there were three false positive SGRs and no false positive sweat test before injection. After injection, one patient with an upper level of sensory blockade at T5 had persistent SGRs and positive sweat tests (false negative results). The study showed the sensitivity of the SGR and the sweat tests to be 90%. The specificity of the SGR was 56% compared to 100% for the sweat tests. The accuracy of the SGR was 74% compared to 95% for the sweat tests.

Key Words: ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, REGIONAL—sympathetic • MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES—sympathetic activity • SYMPATHETIC NERVOUS SYSTEM—blockade




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. T. Benzon
Studies on Diagnostic Injections and Surgery for Low Back Pain: Problems, Advances, and Opportunities
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2007; 105(6): 1523 - 1525.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Chernyak, P. Sengupta, R. Lenhardt, E. Liem, A. G. Doufas, D. I. Sessler, and O. Akca
The Timing of Acupuncture Stimulation Does Not Influence Anesthetic Requirement
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 387 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1985 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1985 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.