JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1985; 64:795-800
© 1985 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gross, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gross, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, M. W.

Induction Dose—Response Curves for Midazolam and Ketamine in Premedicated ASA Class III and IV Patients

Jeffrey B. Gross, MD, Craig B. Caldwell, MD, and McIver W. Edwards, MD

The Departments of Anesthesia, University of Pennsylvania and Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

Using probit analysis, dose-response curves for induction of anesthesia with midazolam or ketamine were constructed in ASA class III and IV patients premedicated with morphine, 0.1 mg/kg, and glycopyrrolate, 4 µg/kg. For ketamine, ED50 values for abolition of the response to verbal commands, eyelash stimulation, and painful stimulation were 0.9, 1.3, and 1.3 mg/kg, respectively; corresponding ED95 values were 1.6, 2.3, and 4.3 mg/kg, which are within the range of clinically recommended doses. For midazolam, ED50 values for verbal commands, eyelash stimulation, and painful stimulation were 0.19, 0.24, and 0.36 mg/kg, significantly greater than those previously reported for unpremedicated ASA class I and II patients. The corresponding ED45 values, 0.35, 0.43, and 1.04 mg/kg exceed previously reported values and are appreciably greater than the doses used in most previous studies of midazolam induction

Midazolam decreased systolic blood pressure slightly but significantly (from 138 ± 4 to 128 ± 4 mm Hg, · Formula sem, P < 0.005), while diastolic blood pressure and heart rate remained unchanged. In contrast, ketamine increased systolic blood pressure (from 141 ± 4 to 164 ± 5 mm Hg, P < 0.005), diastolic blood pressure (from 71 ± 3 to 88 ± 4 mm Hg, P < 0.005), and heart rate (from 84 ± 2 to 102 ± 4 beats/min, P < 0.005). On the basis of these data, we conclude that in ASA class III and IV patients, midazolam induction allows for hemodynamic stability and avoids the significant tachycardia and hypertension associated with equipotent doses of ketamine

Key Words: INDUCTION, ANESTHESIA—midazolam, ketamine.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1985 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.