JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1985; 64:871-876
© 1985 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giese, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nelissen, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giese, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nelissen, R. H.

Etomidate versus Thiopental for Induction of Anesthesia

Jeffrey L. Giese, MD, Randall J. Stockham, MD, Theodore H. Stanley, MD, Nathan L. Pace, MD, and Rob H. Nelissen, DrS

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Abstract

Hemodynamic changes and side effects of anesthesia induction with etomidate or thiopental were evaluated in 83 ASA class I or 11 patients. Patients were randomly assigned to one of 12 groups according to pretreatment drug (fentanyl, 100 µg, or normal saline intravenously), induction agent (etomidate, 0.4 mg/kg, or thiopental, 4 mg/kg), and maintenance anesthetic technique (isoflurane-oxygen, isoflurane-nitrous oxide-oxygen, or fentanyl-nitrous oxide-oxygen). The purpose of this experiment, of factorial design, was to evaluate the combined effects of two or more experimental variables used simultaneously and to observe interaction effects. There were significant increases in heart rate in all groups, especially after tracheal intubation. These increases were attenuated but not eliminated by fentanyl pretreatment. Systolic arterial blood pressure increased significantly after intubation and was not affected either by fentanyl pretreatment or by the induction agent. Patients in whom anesthesia was induced with etomidate had a greater incidence of pain on injection and myoclonus and a lesser incidence of apnea than patients in whom anesthesia was induced with thiopental. Fentanyl pretreatment significantly decreased the incidence of pain on injection and myoclonus, but it increased the incidence of apnea when anesthesia was induced with etomidate. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was similar after thiopental and etomidate and was unaffected by fentanyl pretreatment. However, patients in whom anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (with and without nitrous oxide) had a significantly lower incidence of nausea and vomiting than did patients given fentanyl-N2O-O2 for maintenance of anesthesia. These results indicate that there is no significant difference between etomidate and thiopental as anesthetic induction agents in healthy patients. Pretreatment with a small dose of fentanyl attenuates the increases in heart rate associated with induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation with either etomidate or thiopental, and reduces but does not eliminate side effects associated with etomidate induction.

Key Words: INDUCTION, ANESTHESIA—etomidate, thiopental • ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS—etomidate, thiopental




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. Huter, T. Schreiber, M. Gugel, and K. Schwarzkopf
Low-Dose Intravenous Midazolam Reduces Etomidate-Induced Myoclonus: A Prospective, Randomized Study in Patients Undergoing Elective Cardioversion
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2007; 105(5): 1298 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Guler, T. Satilmis, S. B. Akinci, B. Celebioglu, and M. Kanbak
Magnesium Sulfate Pretreatment Reduces Myoclonus After Etomidate
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 705 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
M. N. Avramov and P. F. White
Etomidate: Its Pharmacologic and Physiologic Effects
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, July 1, 1997; 1(2): 132 - 141.
[PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1985 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.