JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1985; 64:897-910
© 1985 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flacke, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flacke, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, R. L.

Comparison of Morphine, Meperidine, Fentanyl, and Sufentanil in Balanced Anesthesia

A Double-Blind Study

Joan W. Flacke, MD, Byron C. Bloor, PhD, Benjamin J. Kripke, MD, Werner E. Flacke, MD, Christine M. Warneck, MD, Aaron P. Van Etten, MS, David H. Wong, MD, and Ronald L. Katz, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, University of California Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.

Abstract

A double-blind study comparing four narcotic analgesics of different potencies, meperidine, morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil, was performed on consenting patients undergoing general or orthopedic surgery under balanced anesthesia. Blood pressure, measured through an indwelling arterial catheter, was recorded continuously, as were ECG and heart rates. The narcotics, made up in equipotent concentrations, were given as indicated by hemodynamic and clinical signs. Arterial blood samples were taken before and after induction, after intubation, before and after incision, at intervals during the operation, and postoperatively. Hemodynamic Values and plasma levels of catecholamines during and after induction, intubation, incision, and throughout the operation were least in patients given sufentanil and greatest in those who received morphine or meperidine. Heart rates increased significantly after induction with meperidine and were significantly higher after intubation in morphine-treated and meperidine-treated patients than they were in patients receiving sufentanil. Intraoperatively, mean arterial blood pressure, rate-pressure product, and plasma norepinephrine levels were lowest in patients receiving sufentanil. Intraoperative plasma epinephrine levels were lowest in patients receiving sufentanil and meperidine. Because of increases in blood pressure, heart rate, or both to greater than 15% above control values, supplementation with a potent inhalational agent was necessary in 38%, 30%, and 29% of the patients given meperidine, morphine, and fentanyl, respectively. No sufentanil patient required supplimentation. Side effects, including histamine release accompanied by tachycardia and hypotension, were most frequent and most severe in patients who received meperidine. After extubation, marked increases in heart rate, blood pressure, and plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine occurred in some patients in each group. The incidence of postoperative respiratory depression was greatest in patients given morphine (mean dose of naloxone 8.6 µg/kg) and least with sufentanil (mean dose of naloxone 1.8 µg/kg) and fentanyl (3.2 µg/kg naloxone).

Key Words: ANESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS—narcotics • ANALGESICS—morphine, meperidine, fentanyl, sufentanil




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. S. Murphy, J. W. Szokol, J. H. Marymont, S. B. Greenberg, M. J. Avram, J. S. Vender, S. S. Sherwani, M. Nisman, and V. Doroski
Morphine-Based Cardiac Anesthesia Provides Superior Early Recovery Compared with Fentanyl in Elective Cardiac Surgery Patients
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 311 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Wittmann, T. Schaaf, I. Peters, S. Wirz, B. W. Urban, and M. Barann
The Effects of Fentanyl-Like Opioids and Hydromorphone on Human 5-HT3A Receptors
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Breitfeld, J. Peters, T. Vockel, C. Lorenz, and M. Eikermann
Emetic effects of morphine and piritramide
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2003; 91(2): 218 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, A. Albertin, G. Fanelli, F. Deni, M. Berti, G. Danelli, F. Grifoni, and G. Torri
A Comparison of Remifentanil and Sufentanil as Adjuvants During Sevoflurane Anesthesia with Epidural Analgesia for Upper Abdominal Surgery: Effects on Postoperative Recovery and Respiratory Function
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(5): 1269 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Schricker, F. Carli, M. Schreiber, U. Wachter, W. Geisser, R. Lattermann, and M. Georgieff
Propofol/Sufentanil Anesthesia Suppresses the Metabolic and Endocrine Response During, Not After, Lower Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2000; 90(2): 450 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. C. Wilson, N. G. Smedira, C. Fink, J. A. McDowell, and J. M. Luce
Ordering and Administration of Sedatives and Analgesics During the Withholding and Withdrawal of Life Support From Critically III Patients
JAMA, February 19, 1992; 267(7): 949 - 953.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1985 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1985 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.