JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1985; 64:917-923
© 1985 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rocco, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Freiberger, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rocco, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Freiberger, D.

Differential Spread of Blockade of Touch, Cold, and Pinprick during Spinal Anesthesia

Angelo G. Rocco, MD, Stephen A. Raymond, PhD, Ellen Murray, RN, Usha Dhingra, MD, and Dubravka Freiberger, MD

Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

The differential levels of sensory blockade of pinprick, cold, and touch were monitored throughout the course of spinal anesthesia administered to 50 patients to determine variations in the degree of spread during onset, plateau, and regression, and to establish the effects of epinephrine and the effect of posture during injection. A significant difference was observed between the dermatomal level of sensory loss of touch and the dermatomal level of loss of either pinprick or cold during onset, at 5 min in patients given tetracaine with epinephrine, at time of maximum spread in patients given tetracaine with epinephrine or in the sitting position, and in all groups during regression. Loss of touch began later, never extended as far cephalad, and regressed sooner. The extent of this difference was greatest during regression, when the anesthetic was given to patients in the sitting position, after epinephrine. The level at which the sense of touch was lost seemed to mark the limits of the zone of solid spinal anesthesia; these limits could not he assessed effectively using pinprick. We propose that loss of touch sensation he used to assess whether anesthesia is adequate to avoid tourniquet pain. If there is loss of touch sensation above the LZ dermatome, it is unlikely that tourniquet pain will occur.

Key Words: ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, REGIONAL—depth




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Hocking and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Intrathecal drug spread
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 568 - 578.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C.-H. Cherng, C.-S. Wong, F.-L. Chang, S.-T. Ho, and C.-H. Lee
Epidural Morphine Delays the Onset of Tourniquet Pain During Epidural Lidocaine Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2002; 94(6): 1614 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1985 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.