JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1986; 65:31-36
© 1986 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newsome, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Curling, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newsome, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Curling, P. E.

Severe Preeclampsia

Hemodynamic Effects of Lumbar Epidural Anesthesia

Lars R. Newsome, MD, Roderick S. Bramwell, MD, and Patrick E. Curling, MD

Received from the Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Abstract

The hemodynamic effects of lumbar epidural anesthesia (LEA) were evaluated in 11 patients with severe preeclampsia. All patients were receiving magnesium sulfate upon entry into the study. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained before and after LEA, at delivery, and 2 hr postpartum. Lumbar epidural anesthesia significantly reduced mean arterial pressure from 121.4 mm Hg to 97.7 mm Hg, without altering cardiac index, pulmonary vascular resistance, central venous pressure (CVP), or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). There was a slight but statistically insignificant decrease in systemic vascular resistance from 1078 to 900.7 dynes-sec-cm–5. Cardiac index and left ventricular stroke work index were elevated in these patients, suggesting hyperdynamic left ventricular function. There was poor correlation between PCWP and CVP in several patients. We conclude that LEA may be used safely in severe preeclamptic patients and that pulmonary arterial catheters may help guide appropriate therapy in preeclamptic patients with cardiac failure or oliguria refractory to modest fluid challenges.

Key Words: ANESTHESIA—obstetric • ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES—epidural




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Visalyaputra, O. Rodanant, W. Somboonviboon, K. Tantivitayatan, S. Thienthong, and W. Saengchote
Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Severe Preeclampsia: A Prospective Randomized, Multicenter Study
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 862 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
O. Salha and J. J Walker
Management options: Modern management of eclampsia
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 1999; 75(880): 78 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1986 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.