| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Departments of Medicine and Anesthesiology, and the Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
Severe bronchospasm that is refractory to aggressive medical therapy and that requires tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation is rare, occurring in only about 2% of patients hospitalized for asthma (1). Indeed, tracheal intubation may even worsen bronchospasm, and mechanical ventilation in status asthmaticus is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality (1). Heavy sedation and paralysis with pancuronium bromide may facilitate mechanical ventilation (2), but have no direct bronchodilatory effects. Inhalational anesthetics have been used as broncho-dilators for many years. In particular, halothane has been recommended for asthmatics refractory to maximal medical therapy (3), but its use has been limited by the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias (4). There are, however, other inhalational anesthetics with bronchodilatory effects that are less arrhythmogenic (5).
We report three patients with status asthmaticus refractory to maximal medical therapy who continued to deteriorate after intubation and paralysis but responded dramatically to the use of isoflurane and enflurane.
|