JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1986; 65:325-329
© 1986 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fink, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fink, B. R.

Mechanism of Differential Epidural Block

B. Raymond Fink, MD, FFARCS

Received from the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, and Cancer Pain Research Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98195.

Abstract

Pain block in obstetric epidural anesthesia is usually accompanied by relatively persistent retention of motor power; however, the reason for this is not entirely clear. The differential effect has been ascribed to a relatively high resistance of large fibers to conduction block. However, recent results from individual axons are incompatible with that explanation and have prompted the suggestion that greater vascularity in ventral than in dorsal roots might account for the phenomenon. To test this hypothesis, transverse sections of five sets of human dorsal and ventral C-8, T-7, and L-5 roots were examined by an immunohistochemical method that is specific for factor VIII and stains the vascular endothelium. A naive tally of the stained vessels failed to reveal any excess vascularity of the ventral roots, and the hypothesis was therefore rejected. However, it was noted at autopsy that the thin dural sleeve surrounding the roots, where epidural anesthetic is most likely to penetrate to the nerve fibers, may measure less than 5 mm from the dural sac to the intervertebral foramen, a distance probably too short to contain three internodes of motor fibers, the minimum length of fiber necessary for block by local anesthetic. This anatomy might help explain the clinical differential.

Key Words: ANATOMY—spinal nerve root, vascularity • ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, EPIDURAL—vascularity of nerve roots




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. Amann, L. T. Proctor, J. J. Sebranek, M. W. Eldridge, D. F. Pegelow, and J. A. Dempsey
Somatosensory feedback from the limbs exerts inhibitory influences on central neural drive during whole body endurance exercise
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1714 - 1724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1986 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.