JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1986; 65:365-369
© 1986 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leicht, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leicht, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, S. A.

Prolongation of Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia with Epinephrine and Phenylephrine

Craig H. Leicht, MD, MPH, and Stephen A. Carlson, MD

Received from the Departments of Anesthesiology and Clinical Investigation, Naval Hospital, San Diego, California.

Abstract

The effect of vasoconstrictors on the duration of lidocaine spinal anesthesia is controversial. We conducted a double-blind study of 28 neurologically normal ASA Class I or II patients to determine the effect of vasoconstrictors (epinephrine and phenylephrine) on the duration of lidocaine spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomized into three groups. All patients received 1.2 mg lidocaine per inch body height, mixed with 0.5 ml of test solution. Group 1 patients received lidocaine plus 0.5 ml normal saline; Group 2 patients received lidocaine plus 0.3 mg epinephrine; Group 3 patients received lidocaine plus 5 mg phenylephrine. Segmental sensory blockade was assessed by pinprick at 2-min intervals for the first 20 min and then every 5 min thereafter. Mean highest level was between T-2 and T-3 for all 3 groups. Time from injection to highest sensory level was similar in Groups 1 and 3, 11.6 ± 3.57 and 12.0 ± 5.10 min, respectively, but was significantly prolonged in Group 2, 18.1 ± 4.33 min. Time for regression by two sensory dermatomes were significantly prolonged in both Groups 2 and 3, 102.9 ± 18.1 and 105.7 ± 33.1 min, respectively, compared to 78.1 ± 12.6 min in Group 1. Times for regression to T-12 was also significantly prolonged in both Groups 2 and 3, 153.7 ± 27.6 and 156.8 ± 26.7 min, respectively, compared to 117.71 ± 10.0 min in Group 1. In the doses used in the present study, both epinephrine and phenylephrine significantly prolong the duration of lidocaine spinal anesthesia.

Key Words: ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES—spinal







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1986 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.