JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DiFazio, C. A. Articles by Johns, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by DiFazio, C. A. Articles by Johns, R. A.

Comparison of pH-Adjusted Lidocaine Solutions for Epidural Anesthesia

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Abstract

One hundred forty-eight adult patients having epidural anesthesia for cesarean section, postpartum tubal ligation, lower extremity orthopedic procedures, or lithotriptic therapy were assigned to five groups. Group 1 patients were given a commercially prepared 1.5% lidocaine solution with 1:200,000 epinephrine plus 1 ml of normal saline per 10 ml of lidocaine; the solution pH was 4.6. Group 2 patients were given commercially prepared 1.5% lidocaine solution plus 1:200,000 epinephrine, with 1 mEq (1 ml) NaHCO₃ per 10 ml of lidocaine; the solution pH was 7.15. Group 3 patients received the commercial solution of 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine; the solution pH was 4.55. Group 4 patients were given a mixture of 18 ml of 2% lidocaine with 30 ml of 1.5% lidocaine, both commercially packaged with 1:200,000 epinephrine, plus 1 mEq (1 ml) of NaHCO₃ added per 10 ml of solution; the solution pH was 7.2. Group 5 patients received 1.5% plain lidocaine to which epinephrine was added to a final concentration of 1:200,000; the solution pH was 6.35. Times of onset of analgesia (time between the completion of the anesthetic injection and loss of scratch sensation at the right hip (L-2 dermatome)) and of surgical anesthesia (time between completion of injection and loss of discomfort following tetanic stimulation produced by a nerve stimulator applied to skin on the right hip) were significantly more rapid in the groups that received the pH-adjusted solutions (groups 4 and 2). Group 4 had the fastest mean onset time, 1.92 ± 0.17 min, followed by group 2, 3.31 ± 0.23 min. Onset times were progressively longer in group 5 at 4.27 ± 0.51 min, group 3 at 4.73 ± 0.37 min, and group 1 at 7.11 ± 0.82 min. The spread of sensory blockade was also significantly more rapid in the pH-adjusted groups 5, 10, and 15 min after epidural injection. In patients having cesarean sections in groups 1 and 2, plasma lidocaine levels in the maternal peripheral venous and in umbilical cord blood and Apgar scores were similar in both groups.

Key Words: ANESTHETICS, LOCAL—lidocaine • ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES—epidural

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. MEIT, V. YASEK, C. K. SHANNON, D. HICKMAN, and D. WILLIAMS Techniques for reducing anesthetic injection pain: An interdisciplinary survey of knowledge and application J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2004; 135(9): 1243 - 1250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Arakawa, Y. Aoyama, and Y. Ohe Block of the sacral segments in lumbar epidural anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2003; 90(2): 173 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Arakawa, Y. Aoyama, and Y. Ohe Epidural bolus injection with alkalinized lidocaine improves blockade of the first sacral segment - a brief report: [L'injection epidurale d'un bolus de lidocaine alcalinisee ameliore le blocage du premier segment sacre - un resume] Can J Anesth, June 1, 2002; 49(6): 566 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999