This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Munhall, R. J. Articles by Winnie, A. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Munhall, R. J. Articles by Winnie, A. P.

Incidence and Etiology of Failed Spinal Anesthetics in a University Hospital

A Prospective Study

Received from the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Abstract

Two recent retrospective reports on the incidence of failed spinal anesthetics that indicated extremely variable results prompted the present prospective study of 200 consecutive spinal anesthetics to determine the incidence and causes of failed spinal anesthetics.

Tetracaine was the spinal anesthetic agent utilized in all cases — crystalline tetracaine (Niphanoid) in 71% and a 1% solution in 19% of the cases. The failure rate overall was 4%, with all failures being due to anesthetic factors, both technical and pharmacologic. However, only 25% of the failures were due to errors in technique, and 75% were due to errors in judgment with respect to pharmacologic factors (dosage, use of epinephrine, and/or positioning of the patient). Our data, therefore, differ from those of Levy et al. (Anesth Analg 1985;64:705–10), both in terms of failure rate, which is 25% of theirs, and in terms of causation, with our data indicating errors in judgment to be the causative factor three times as often as errors in technique. Presumably, this difference is due to the greater experience in spinal anesthesia that a resident receives at our institution.

Key Words: ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES—spinal

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. Steiner, L. Hauenstein, W. Ruppen, K. F. Hampl, and M. D. Seeberger Bupivacaine concentrations in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid in patients with failed spinal anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2009; 102(6): 839 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. W. Fettes, J.-R. Jansson, and J. A. W. Wildsmith Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2009; 102(6): 739 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Standl, A. Stanek, M.-A. Burmeister, S. Gruschow, B. Wahlen, K. Muller, J. Biscoping, and H.-A. Adams Spinal Anesthesia Performance Conditions and Side Effects Are Comparable Between the Newly Designed Ballpen and the Sprotte Needle: Results of a Prospective Comparative Randomized Multicenter Study Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 512 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]