JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1988; 67:876-883
© 1988 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raphael, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Doran, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raphael, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Doran, D. J.

A Response Algorithm for The Low-Pressure Alarm Condition

David T. Raphael, MD, phD, Robert S. Weller, MD, and Daniel J. Doran, CRNA

Received from the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut.

A response algorithm consists of a logical sequence of maneuvers to be performed in response to a specific condition. With the advent of alarm-equipped monitors that alert anesthesiologists to the presence of potentially hazardous clinical conditions, a need has arisen to develop the corresponding alarm-oriented responses expected from anesthesiologists; this problem, however, has not been satisfactorily addressed in the literature. An algorithm is proposed that guides the anesthesiologist through the three limbs of the ventilation system — gas supply system, breathing circuit, and mechanical ventilator — in response to a low-pressure alarm condition during automatic mechanical ventilation, The three-limbed algorithm rapidly and efficiently localizes the likely cause of the low-pressure condition without compromising patient safety; in the event that the search for a cause is fruitless, a default mode of ventilation is employed. A discussion is provided of common causes (e.g., disconnections), alarm-defeating circumstances (false negatives), and potential algorithm-defeating situations (multiple faults).

Key Words: COMPLICATIONS—low-pressure conditions • EQUIPMENT, CIRCUITS—low-pressures • MONITORING—low-pressure conditions




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. Gravenstein, H. Wilkhu, E. B. Liem, S. Tilman, and S. Lampotang
Aestiva Ventilation Mode Selector Switch Failures
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 860 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1988 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1988 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.