JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1989; 68:276-281
© 1989 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Gessel, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gamulin, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Gessel, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gamulin, Z.

Surgical Repair of Hip Fractures Using Continuous Spinal Anesthesia

Comparison of Hypobaric Solutions of Tetracaine and Bupivacaine

Elisabeth F. Van Gessel, MD, Alain Forster, MD, and Zdravko Gamulin, MD

Received from the Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare hypobaric solutions of tetracaine and bupivacaine in 30 geriatric patients undergoing surgical repair of hip fractures while under continuous spinal anesthesia. Tetracaine 1% and bupivacaine 0.5% were mixed with distilled water to prepare hypobaric 0.25% solutions. In a double-blind fashion, all patients received 3 ml (7.5 mg) of either solution in the lateral decubitus position with the operated side up, the table being kept horizontal for 30 minutes after injection. The mean highest sensory levels in both groups, and in both operated and non-operated sides in the same group, were comparable, ranging between T7 and T8.5. Duration of analgesia was 134 minutes with tetracaine and 130 minutes with bupivacaine (NS). In both groups, motor blockade was satisfactory in 29/30 patients on the operated side. The frequency of a decrease in systolic blood pressure of more than 30% was similar in the two groups. The authors conclude that hypopobaric solutions of both tetracaine and bupivacaine are suitable for surgical repair of hip fractures in geriatric patients and produce comparable anesthetic and hemodynamic effects.

Key Words: ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES: spinal, continuous hypobaric • ANESTHESIA, LOCAL: tetracaine, bupivacaine • ANESTHESIA, orthopedic




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
V. Minville, O. Fourcade, D. Grousset, C. Chassery, L. Nguyen, K. Asehnoune, A. Colombani, L. Goulmamine, and K. Samii
Spinal anesthesia using single injection small-dose bupivacaine versus continuous catheter injection techniques for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients.
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1559 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Faust, R. Fournier, E. Van Gessel, A. Weber, P. Hoffmeyer, and Z. Gamulin
Isobaric Versus Hypobaric Spinal Bupivacaine for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Lateral Position
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2003; 97(2): 589 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1989 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1989 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.