JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1989; 68:350-352
© 1989 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loper, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ready, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loper, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ready, L. B.

Epidural Morphine After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

A Comparison with Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine

Keith A. Loper, MD, and L. Brian Ready, MD

Received from the Acute Pain Service, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Abstract

To compare the management of postoperative pain using morphine administered by epidural catheter with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), we prospectively studied 47 consecutive cases involving repair of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Both the quality of analgesia and the incidence of side effects were documented. Compared with patients receiving PCA morphine, patients given epidural morphine reported significantly lower pain scores both at rest (0.7 ± 1.1 versus 3.4 ± 2.1, P < 0.01) and with mobilization (3.2 ± 2.1 versus 6.1 ± 2.1, P < 0.01). Although patients receiving epidural morphine had a greater incidence of urinary retention, there were no significant differences in the incidence of nausea or pruritis. There was no respiratory depression in either group. We conclude that epidural morphine provides superior analgesia with a clinically inconsequential increase in side effects. Further, epidural morphine may have special advantages when early mobilization is indicated.

Key Words: ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES—Epidural morphine • PAIN—Postoperative • ANALGESICS—morphine




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
L. R. Solomon
Treatment and prevention of pain due to vaso-occlusive crises in adults with sickle cell disease: an educational void
Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 997 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. S. Reuben, N. R. Connelly, and H. Maciolek
Postoperative Analgesia with Controlled-Release Oxycodone for Outpatient Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 1999; 88(6): 1286 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. W. Brown, C. M. Curry, L. M. Ruterbories, F. L. Avery, and P. S. Anson
Evaluation of Pain After Arthroscopically Assisted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1997; 25(2): 182 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. M. Egbert, L. H. Parks, L. M. Short, and M. L. Burnett
Randomized Trial of Postoperative Patient-Controlled Analgesia vs Intramuscular Narcotics in Frail Elderly Men
Arch Intern Med, September 1, 1990; 150(9): 1897 - 1903.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1989 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1989 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.