JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1990; 70:256-261
© 1990 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gambling, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Laszlo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gambling, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Laszlo, C.

Comparison of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia and Conventional Intermittent "Top-Up" Injections During Labor

David R. Gambling, MB, BS, DRCOG, FRCPC, Graham H. McMorland, MB, chB, DA, FRCPC, Patrick Yu, MD, and Claudette Laszlo, RN, BSC

Received from the Department of Anaesthesia, University of British Columbia and Grace Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Abstract

In a prospective, randomized manner, bolus injection patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA; n = 30) and conventional intermittent "top-up" injections (CIT; n = 28) of bupivacaine in nulliparous parturients during first stage of labor were compared. Group A (PCEA) patients self-administered, using a patient-controlled analgesia device, 4-mL increments of 0.125% bupivacaine with 1: 400,000 epinephrine, to a maximum 12 mL/h as required. Group B (CIT) patients received 12 mL of the same solution, on request, from the anesthesiologist. Hourly assessments of pain relief (visual analogue scale), satisfaction, sensory and motor block, blood pressure, and cervical dilatation were made. In addition, retrospective pain assessments were made in patients requesting analgesia in the preceding hour, indicating their maximum pain during that time.

The groups were demographically comparable and equally low hourly bupivacaine requirements were seen (group A, 6.36 ± 0.43 mg; group B, 6.23 ± 0.39 mg) producing similar mean sensory levels. Pain relief obtained in both groups was similar but was associated with greater satisfaction in patients using PCEA (P < 0.05).

This study shows that PCEA is a viable alternative for providing pain relief in the first stage of labor.

Key Words: ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICS—epidural • ANESTHETICS, LOCAL—bupivacaine • PAIN, LABOR • EQUIPMENT, PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J.-M. Bernard, D. Le Roux, L. Vizquel, A. Barthe, J.-M. Gonnet, A. Aldebert, R. M. Benani, C. Fossat, and J. Frouin
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labor: The Effects of the Increase in Bolus and Lockout Interval
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2000; 90(2): 328 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
T. Mom, J.-E. Bazin, F. Commun, C. Dubray, A. Eschalier, C. Derbal, P. Avan, and L. Gilain
Assessment of Postoperative Pain After Laryngeal Surgery for Cancer
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, July 1, 1998; 124(7): 794 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1990 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1990 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.