Anesth Analg 1990; 70:517-522
© 1990 International Anesthesia Research Society
Hearing Loss After Spinal Anesthesia Is Related to Needle Size
Johannes Fog, MD,
Lars P. Wang, MD,
Albert Sundberg, PhD, MD, and
Carlo Mucchiano, MD
Department of Anesthesia, Eksjö-Nässjö Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.
Abstract
Audiograms were performed preoperatively and 2 days postoperatively in 28 patients given spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate. In 14 patients 22-gauge and in 14 patients 26-gauge spinal needles were used. Hearing loss of 10 dB or more at any frequency was observed in 13 of 14 patients in the 22-gauge group and in 4 of 14 patients in the 26-gauge group. There was a statistically significant reduction in hearing level in the low-frequency range in patients in whom the 22-gauge needle was used. Hearing loss was unilateral at five frequencies and bilateral at one frequency.
No cases of postspinal headache occurred. Audiometry may be a more sensitive indication of cerebrospinal fluid leak than postspinal headache.
Key Words: ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, SPINAL EAR, HEARING—spinal anesthesia
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Moussa, D. Abdoulaye, C. Youssouf, G. C. Oumar, T. S. Karim, and T. J. Traore
Cauda equina syndrome and profound hearing loss after spinal anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine.
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2006;
102(6):
1863 - 1864.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Finegold, G. Mandell, M. Vallejo, and S. Ramanathan
Does Spinal Anesthesia Cause Hearing Loss in the Obstetric Population?
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2002;
95(1):
198 - 203.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gultekin and S. Ozcan
Does Hearing Loss After Spinal Anesthesia Differ Between Young and Elderly Patients?
Anesth. Analg.,
May 1, 2002;
94(5):
1318 - 1320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Schaffartzik, J. Hirsch, F. Frickmann, P. Kuhly, and A. Ernst
Hearing Loss after Spinal and General Anesthesia: A Comparative Study
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2000;
91(6):
1466 - 1472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|