This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Leary, R. J. Articles by Benumof, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by O'Leary, R. J., Jr. Articles by Benumof, J. L.

Buccal Pulse Oximeter Is More Accurate Than Finger Pulse Oximeter in Measuring Oxygen Saturation

Department of Anesthesiology, University of California—San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, California

Abstract

Although there have been several anecdotal reports of the use of buccal pulse oximeter monitoring (Spo2) when digital Spo2 monitoring cannot be used, there have been no objective evaluations of the accuracy of buccal Spo2 monitoring. The purpose of this study was to systematically compare buccal Spo2 monitoring to both digital Spo2 and arterial 02 saturation monitoring (Sao2) in both generally anesthetized patients in the operating room (n = 31) and critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (n = 23). Buccal Spo2 probes were prepared by taping a malleable metal bar securely over the back of a Nellcor Oxisen-sor D-25 probe and bending the metal bar and buccal probe firmly around the corner of the patient's mouth. All buccal and finger Spo2 and Sao2 measurements were made simultaneously during hemodynamic stability. We found that buccal Spo2 was higher than finger Spo2 and agreed more closely with Sao2 for both patient groups (98.1% ± 2.6%, 96.8% ± 3.5%, 98.5% ± 2.5%, respectively [mean ± SD]). The operating room patients had higher buccal and finger Spo2 and Sao2 (99.3% ± 1.5%, 98.9% ± 1.4%, 99.5% ± 0.7%, respectively) than the intensive care unit patients (96.4% ± 2.9%, 94.1% ± 3.5%, 96.6% ± 3.5%, respectively). Although buccal Spo2 monitoring has several disadvantages (i.e., the probe requires preparation, can be more difficult to place, may be less readily accepted in awake patients, and is often mechanically dislodged during airway maneuvers), we conclude that buccal Spo2 monitoring is a more than adequate oximetry alternative when digital Spo2 monitoring is not an option (digits are unavailable or available digits are mechanically interfered with).

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. D. Mannheimer The Light Tissue Interaction of Pulse Oximetry Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2007; 105(6S_Suppl): S10 - S17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Wei, Z. Zhu, L. Liu, Y. Zuo, M. Gong, F. Xue, and J. Liu A Pilot Study of Continuous Transtracheal Mixed Venous Oxygen Saturation Monitoring Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2005; 101(2): 440 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Margreiter, C. Keller, and J. Brimacombe The Feasibility of Transesophageal Echocardiograph-Guided Right and Left Ventricular Oximetry in Hemodynamically Stable Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2002; 94(4): 794 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Brimacombe, C. Keller, and J. Margreiter A Pilot Study of Left Tracheal Pulse Oximetry Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(4): 1003 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Keller, J. Brimacombe, F. Agro, and J. Margreiter A Pilot Study of Pharyngeal Pulse Oximetry with the Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Comparison with Finger Oximetry and Arterial Saturation Measurements in Healthy Anesthetized Patients Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2000; 90(2): 440 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]