JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1992; 75:572-579
© 1992 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rapp, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nessly, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rapp, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nessly, M. L.

Comparison of Desflurane With Propofol in Outpatients Undergoing Peripheral Orthopedic Surgery

S. E. Rapp, MD, T. J. Conahan, MD, D. J. Pavlin, MD, W. J. Levy, MD, B. Hautman, MD, J. Lecky, MD, J. Luke, MD, and M. L. Nessly, BS

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, and Department of Anesthesia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

This study was undertaken to compare desflurane with propofol anesthesia in outpatients undergoing peripheral orthopedic surgery. Data were combined from two institutions participating in a multicenter study. Ninety-one patients, ASA physical status I or II, were each randomly assigned to one of four groups. After administration of fentanyl (2 µg/kg) and d-tubocurarine (3 mg), intravenous propofol was administered to induce anesthesia in groups I and II and desflurane in groups III and IV. Maintenance was provided by desflurane/N2O in groups I and III, propofol/N2O in group II, and desflurane/O2 in group IV. Emergence and recovery variables, psychometric test results, and side effects were recorded by observers unaware of the experimental treatment. Patients in group II experienced less nausea than other groups (P = 0.002) despite this group having required more intraoperative fentanyl supplementation than groups III and IV (P = 0.01). Time to emergence, discharge, and psychometric test results were similar in all groups. Desflurane appears to be comparable with propofol as an outpatient anesthetic, facilitating rapid recovery and discharge home.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Gupta, T. Stierer, R. Zuckerman, N. Sakima, S. D. Parker, and L. A. Fleisher
Comparison of Recovery Profile After Ambulatory Anesthesia with Propofol, Isoflurane, Sevoflurane and Desflurane: A Systematic Review
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 632 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. F. Kong, S. T. H. Chew, and P. C. Ip-Yam
Intravenous opioids reduce airway irritation during induction of anaesthesia with desflurane in adults{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2000; 85(3): 364 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Juvin, C. Vadam, L. Malek, H. Dupont, J.-P. Marmuse, and J.-M. Desmonts
Postoperative Recovery After Desflurane, Propofol, or Isoflurane Anesthesia Among Morbidly Obese Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Study
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 714 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1992 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1992 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.