This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kalkman, C. J. Articles by Partridge, B. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kalkman, C. J. Articles by Partridge, B. L.

Intraoperative Monitoring of Tibialis Anterior Muscle Motor Evoked Responses to Transcranial Electrical Stimulation During Partial Neuromuscular Blockade

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Departments of Anesthesiology, University of California—San Diego, and VA Medical Center, San Diego, California

We studied the feasibility of recording motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical stimulation (tc^e-MERs) during partial neuromuscular blockade (NMB). In 11 patients, compound muscle action potentials were recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle in response to transcranial electrical stimulation during various levels of vecuronium-induced NMB. The level of NMB was assessed by accelerometry of the adductor pollicis muscle after train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. The compound muscle action potential was also recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle after direct stimulation of the peroneal nerve (M-response) as an alternative means of assessing the degree of NMB. In all patients, tc^e-MERs could be recorded reliably during anesthesia with N₂O and a continuous infusion of sufentanil (0.5 µg.kg^–1·h^–1). An intact train-of-four was present in all patients, and the amplitude of the first twitch was recorded and designated as the control value. Before administration of vecuronium, the M-response amplitude was 9.6±3.6 (mean±SD) mV, and the tc^e-MER amplitude was 1.21±0.66 mV. Although administration of vecuronium (0.05 mg/kg) resulted in loss of the mechanical adductor pollicis response in 8 of the 11 patients, the M-response and the tc^e-MER remained recordable. Subsequently, during an infusion of vecuronium, adjusted to maintain one or two mechanical responses to train-of-four stimulation, the average M-response to peroneal nerve stimulation was 5.2±2.5 mV (53% of the control value), and tc^e-MER amplitude was 0.59±0.36 mV (59% of the control value). During incomplete relaxation, there was good correlation between the amplitude of the M-response and that of the tc^e-MER (r = 0.75; P < 0.01). the ratio of tc^e-MER amplitude to m-response amplitude remained constant, suggesting that it may be feasible to use the amplitude of the m-response to "calibrate" the tce-mer amplitude during vecuronium administration. the data indicate that tce-mer monitoring is feasible during clinically effective levels of NMB.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Yamamoto, M. Kawaguchi, H. Hayashi, T. Horiuchi, S. Inoue, H. Nakase, T. Sakaki, and H. Furuya The Effects of the Neuromuscular Blockade Levels on Amplitudes of Posttetanic Motor-Evoked Potentials and Movement in Response to Transcranial Stimulation in Patients Receiving Propofol and Fentanyl Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 930 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Hargreaves and J. W. H. Watt Intravenous anaesthesia and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation monitoring in spinal column surgery Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 70 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Wada, H. Yao, T. Miyamoto, S. Mukai, and M. Yamamura Prevention and detection of spinal cord injury during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repairs Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 72(1): 80 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. H. Ubags, C. J. Kalkman, H. D. Been, J. H. Koelman, and B. W. O. de Visser A Comparison of Myogenic Motor Evoked Responses to Electrical and Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation During Nitrous Oxide/Opioid Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., March 1, 1999; 88(3): 568 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. van Dongen, H. T. t. Beek, M. A. Schepens, W. J. Morshuis, H. J. Langemeijer, A. de Boer, and E. H. Boezeman Within-Patient Variability of Myogenic Motor-Evoked Potentials to Multipulse Transcranial Electrical Stimulation During Two Levels of Partial Neuromuscular Blockade in Aortic Surgery Anesth. Analg., January 1, 1999; 88(1): 22 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. de Haan, C. J. Kalkman, B. A. de Mol, L. H. Ubags, D. J. Veldman, and M. J. H. M. Jacobs EFFICACY OF TRANSCRANIAL MOTOR-EVOKED MYOGENIC POTENTIALS TO DETECT SPINAL CORD ISCHEMIA DURING OPERATIONS FOR THORACOABDOMINAL ANEURYSMS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1997; 113(1): 87 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text]