Anesth Analg 1992; 75:696-701
© 1992 International Anesthesia Research Society
Differences in pH Management and Pulsatile/Nonpulsatile Perfusion During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Do Not Influence Renal Function
Neal H. Badner, MD,
John M. Murkin, MD, and
Peter Lok, RRT
Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
The renal effects of pulsatile (pulse pressure 18.0 ± 1.5 mm Hg [mean ± SEM]) or nonpulsatile perfusion (mean pulse pressure 1.9 ± 0.4 mm Hg) during either -stat (mean PaC02 41.2 ± 0.9 mm Hg measured at 37°C) or pH-stat (mean PaC02 60.6 ± 1.7 mm Hg measured at 37°C) pH management of hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied in 100 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Mean urine output, fractional excretion of sodium and potassium, and renal failure index all increased during the study period; however, there was no difference among the four different CPB management groups. Mean postoperative creatinine and blood urea nitrogen values decreased compared with preoperative values, again without differences among treatment groups. Three patients developed acute renal insufficiency; of these, two had received nonpulsatile perfusion and pH-stat management, and the other had been managed with pulsatile perfusion and pH-stat management. These three patients all had undergone prolonged CPB and required at least two vasoactive drugs and the use of an intraaortic balloon pump to be weaned from CPB. In patients with normal preoperative renal function undergoing hypothermic CPB, neither the mode of perfusion, pulsatile or nonpulsatile, nor the method of pH management, pH-stat or -stat, influences perioperative renal function.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. S. Murphy, E. A. Hessel II, and R. C. Groom
Optimal Perfusion During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: An Evidence-Based Approach
Anesth. Analg.,
May 1, 2009;
108(5):
1394 - 1417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Hammon
Extracorporeal Circulation: Perfusion System
Card. Surg. Adult,
January 1, 2008;
3(2008):
350 - 370.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ingyinn, K. Rais-Bahrami, R. Evangelista, I. Hogan, O. Rivera, G. T Mikesell, and B. L Short
Comparison of the effect of venovenous versus venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on renal blood flow in newborn lambs
Perfusion,
May 1, 2004;
19(3):
163 - 170.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Hessel II and L. H. Edmunds Jr.
Extracorporeal Circulation: Perfusion Systems
Card. Surg. Adult,
January 1, 2003;
2(2003):
317 - 338.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Naughton and C. A. Bashour
Mechanical Support After Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
September 1, 2002;
6(3):
237 - 257.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 1, 1999;
34(4):
1262 - 1347.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Murkin, J. S. Martzke, A. M. Buchan, C. Bentley, and C. J. Wong
A RANDOMIZED STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF PERFUSION TECHNIQUE AND pH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY IN 316 PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY:I. Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
August 1, 1995;
110(2):
340 - 348.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Knothe, J. Boldt, B. Zickmann, S. Konstantinov, P. Dick, F. Dapper, and G. Hempelmann
Influence of different flow modi during extracorporeal circulation on endothelial-derived vasoactive substances
Perfusion,
July 1, 1995;
10(4):
229 - 236.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|