JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1992; 75:724-728
© 1992 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jung, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bedford, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jung, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bedford, R.

Isoflurane and Nitrous Oxide

Comparative Impact on Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure in Patients With Brain Tumors

Richard Jung, MD, Ruth Reinsel, PhD, William Marx, MD, Joseph Galicich, MD, and Robert Bedford, MD

Anesthesiology Service and Neurological Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York

The relative effects on cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) of equipotent concentrations of isoflurane and N20 were compared in 20 patients with brain tumors who had lumbar subarachnoid catheters in place. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of two anesthetic sequences: group 1, 0.7% end-tidal isoflurane in 02, which was changed to 70% N20 in O2; or group 2, 70% N20 in 02, which was changed to 0.7% end-tidal isoflurane in Oz. End-tidal Pco2 and percent end-tidal N2O and isoflurane were monitored by mass spectrometry from just before changing anesthetics (time = 0 min) until the end of a 20-min observation period (time = 20 min). Ventilation was held constant at Paco2 = 36 ± 1 mm Hg (mean ± SE). The patients in group 1 sustained an increase in CSFP that reached a maximum of 33% above the value at 0 min, despite a 3-mm Hg decrease in Paco2 (P < 0.05). By contrast, CSFP remained unchanged in group 2. Although the absolute increase in CSFP after replacement of isoflurane/02 by N20/02 anesthesia was relatively small (9 ± 1 to 12 ± 2 mm Hg; P < 0.05), the absence of a similar effect in patients where N20 was replaced by isoflurane suggests that replacement of isoflurane by an equipotent concentration of N2O is more likely to lead to an increase in CSFP in patients with altered intracranial dynamics than is replacement of N20 by isoflurane.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1992 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1992 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.